Teams

LTBotkins/CaldwellPk

2022 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-02vs LKPippin/JettonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Bograd / Aimee Reimann vs Amy Barnett / Samantha Schneider4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Carvelli / Jean Resener vs Tina Church / Gay Thorne6-3, 6-1
2022-04-25vs LSBeardslee/WestportWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Bograd / Margaret Johnson vs Zahra Simonetti / Brenda Clay6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Francomano vs Kathleen Stiffler4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPam Britt / Amy Lawton vs Cindy Orr / Meagan Palmer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-04vs LPSaine/LNTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristin Carvelli / Jean Resener vs Danielle Fowler / Cori Peters2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNicole Francomano vs Patricia Bochey6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPam Britt / Sheryl Theisen vs Deedee Beem / Kristin Miller3-6, 3-6
2022-03-28vs LSMcCue-Takes/EdgemoorLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Bograd / Margaret Johnson vs Louisa Dow / Angela Marchant2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesNicole Francomano vs Leah Terry6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPam Britt / Tiffany Botkins vs Katherine Karnatz / Christin Darnell5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-21vs LKPO-Powell/Westport 18sWon 31
W#1 DoublesLisa Bograd / Aimee Reimann vs Ann Murphy / Marilou Martin6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Carvelli / Jean Resener vs Sherilyn Dlugolenski / Astrid Peterson4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesNicole Francomano vs Mali Robinson7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTiffany Botkins / Pam Britt vs Pam Barbagli / Beth Franck6-4, 6-4
2022-03-18vs LKPippin/JettonLost 13
W#1 DoublesMindy Sells / Sheryl Theisen vs Samantha Schneider / Karen Pippin6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTiffany Botkins / Pam Britt vs Gretchen Earnshaw / Martine Maness3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesNicole Francomano vs Amy Barnett6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Lawton / Jean Resener vs Lauren West / Dawn Metzler5-7, 1-6
2022-03-14vs LCAburrow/NorthstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesMindy Sells / Sheryl Theisen vs Tammy Cline / Susan Newman6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesNicole Francomano vs Caitlin Aburrow6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTiffany Botkins / Pam Britt vs Sherry Carpenter / Suzy Wright7-6, 6-3
2022-02-28vs LSBeardslee/WestportWon 40
W#1 DoublesMindy Sells / Sheryl Theisen vs Danielle Curwood / Lauren Athey7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAimee Reimann / Lisa Bograd vs Heather Bain / Tracy Reiser6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesNicole Francomano vs Zahra Simonetti3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPam Britt / Tiffany Botkins vs Meagan Palmer / Kristen Rogers6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Nicole Francomano
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.07
Lisa Bograd
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.00
Margaret Johnson
published
2.94
Kristin Carvelli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Aimee Reimann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Pam Britt
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.76
Jean Resener
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Amy Lawton
published 3
2.58
Sheryl Theisen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Mindy Sells
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Bograd + Margaret Johnson4165% games+16.0% vs expected
Lisa Bograd + Aimee Reimann17559% games+9.8% vs expected
Kristin Carvelli + Jean Resener81049% games+2.1% vs expected
Pam Britt + Lisa Bograd91049% games+1.6% vs expected
Pam Britt + Aimee Reimann3353% gamesnot enough data
Pam Britt + Kristin Carvelli213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Lawton + Margaret Johnson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nicole Francomano
31W–26L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3
Lisa Bograd
104W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.07
Margaret Johnson
24W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Kristin Carvelli
63W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Aimee Reimann
77W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Pam Britt
112W–102L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Jean Resener
62W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Amy Lawton
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Sheryl Theisen
84W–130L career · 4 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
Mindy Sells
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.