Teams

Wagener: Wise Aces

2024 ADULT 55 & Over SUMMER DAYTIME · 8.0 WOMEN

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-07-17vs Toleu: Crush and BurnWon 10
W#3 DoublesTracy Halvin / Stacia Lynch vs Zeny McCoy / Carol Seaberg6-4, 6-2
2024-05-29vs Ogren/Biewen 55+ DAYLost 01
L#3 DoublesLynne O'Reilly / Tracy Halvin vs Gina Vogt / Karen Nelson6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Shelley Wagener
published
3.88
Kelley Lindes
published
3.80
Dede Montgomery
published 4
3.72
Lisa LaCombe
published
3.70
Carol Engstrom
published 4
3.68
Lynne O'Reilly
published
3.65
Mary Donovan
published
3.64
Carol Samuelson
published 4
3.63
Debbie Vorpahl
published 4
3.58
Martha Shannon
published
3.57
Lynne Kaufman
published
Karin Dayton
published
Kim Brandser
published
Stacia Lynch
published
Tracy Halvin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Vorpahl + Lynne Kaufman2646% games+3.6% vs expected
Mary Donovan + Lynne Kaufman6747% games+3.4% vs expected
Carol Samuelson + Lynne O'Reilly111451% games+1.8% vs expected
Martha Shannon + Lisa LaCombe1442% games−9.5% vs expected
Debbie Vorpahl + Kelley Lindes033 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Vorpahl + Lynne O'Reilly213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelley Wagener
29W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
Kelley Lindes
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Dede Montgomery
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Lisa LaCombe
21W–22L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Carol Engstrom
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Lynne O'Reilly
20W–19L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Mary Donovan
17W–24L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Carol Samuelson
14W–22L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.64
4
Debbie Vorpahl
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
Martha Shannon
25W–26L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
Lynne Kaufman
29W–46L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Karin Dayton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Brandser
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacia Lynch
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracy Halvin
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.