Teams

IE-CL-Linda H.

2021 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.0

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-07vs IE-CCCC-E. Rydall/Kelly B.Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Lorette Oliver vs Elizabeth Rydall / Stephanie Ells2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathie Clay / Jill Garber vs Sheila Palmer / Madeleine Taylor4-6, 2-6
2021-07-31vs IE-LLW-Andrea BohnLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Jennifer Denson vs Sue Muscarella / Lori Borresen2-6, 3-6
2021-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Lorette Oliver vs Rosanna Roa / Brandi Clarke6-3, 6-4
2021-07-18vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathie Clay / Sandee Clow vs Elizabeth Bentley / Cathy Williams4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-07-03vs IE-CCCC-E. Rydall/Kelly B.Split 11
L#1 DoublesKathie Clay / Julie Sell vs Stephanie Ells / Kelly Barhorst2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Lorette Oliver vs Sheila Palmer / Madeleine Taylor6-3, 6-4
2021-06-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Lorette Oliver vs Andrea Bohn / Sheila Walkington0-6, 1-6
2021-06-19vs IE-APTC-Cleo CollierWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathie Clay / Jennifer Denson vs Elizabeth Curtiss / Stacey Hubbard4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-12vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Lorette Oliver vs Andrea Van Soest / Irene Capen1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Kathie Clay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Sandee Clow
published
2.36
Linda Hockenbery
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Julie Sell
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kathie Clay
40W–49L career · 4 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
Sandee Clow
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Linda Hockenbery
34W–106L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
2.36
Julie Sell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.