Teams

IE-APTC-Cleo Collier

2021 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-01vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterWon 10
W#1 DoublesGINA SKIBAR / Elizabeth Curtiss vs Stacy Westfall / Andrea Van Soest6-3, 6-2
2021-07-24vs IE-CL-Linda H.Won 20
W#1 SinglesCleo Collier vs Jennifer Denson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Curtiss / Stacey Hubbard vs Sandee Clow / Kerry Keith6-1, 7-6
2021-07-18vs IE-CCCC-E. Rydall/Kelly B.Won 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Curtiss / Stacey Hubbard vs Kam Jara / Elizabeth Rydall7-6, 6-4
2021-07-11vs IE-LLW-Andrea BohnLost 02
L#1 SinglesCleo Collier vs Julie Frakes2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Curtiss / Stacey Hubbard vs Sheila Walkington / Erin Furlong0-6, 1-6
2021-06-27vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterWon 10
W#1 SinglesCleo Collier vs Rosa Galeas-Vamadeva3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-06-19vs IE-CL-Linda H.Split 11
W#1 SinglesCleo Collier vs Kacie Pedini6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Curtiss / Stacey Hubbard vs Kathie Clay / Jennifer Denson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-06-13vs IE-CCCC-E. Rydall/Kelly B.Split 11
L#1 DoublesDionna Growsky / Elizabeth Curtiss vs Elizabeth Rydall / Beverly Haller4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCleo Collier vs Stephanie Ells7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Cleo Collier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Elizabeth Curtiss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
GINA SKIBAR
published 3.5
2.82
Jo Russo-Pereyra
published 3
Sherry MacKay
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

GINA SKIBAR + Jo Russo-Pereyra7561% gamesnot enough data
GINA SKIBAR + Elizabeth Curtiss3259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cleo Collier
88W–64L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Elizabeth Curtiss
84W–52L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
GINA SKIBAR
114W–80L career · no lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
3.10
3
Jo Russo-Pereyra
79W–72L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
Sherry MacKay
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.