Teams

BLeonnig (CSRC) SFAM

2023-2024 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 4.0 Women; Evening

3 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-02-07vs TRamsay (Life Time) Double the FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesSameena Hassan / Julie Hollifield vs Tammy Ramsay / Pamela Burks3-6, 6-7
2024-02-04vs OClaxton (Life Time) Tons O FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Leonnig / Julie Hollifield vs Tonya Terry / Stacey Whitney6-3, 6-3
2024-02-01vs ABarrett/STorres (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Leonnig / Julie Hollifield vs Sandra Torres / Kristin Kapur6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesJulie Hollifield / Brooke Leonnig vs Michele Sutherland / Emily Weigel6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-01-13vs SReynolds (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Leonnig / Sameena Hassan vs Stefanie Reynolds / Lauren Woodward2-6, 4-6
2023-12-16vs CWaldrop/CPeterson (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Leonnig / Julie Hollifield vs Christina Peterson / Amanda Patrocino5-7, 6-7
2023-12-05vs NMiller (OPRC) op flexorsLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Leonnig / Julie Hollifield vs Sarah Niess / Kelly Floyd2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-11-15vs SSteffey (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSameena Hassan / Julie Hollifield vs Pauline Styers / Shelly Steffey7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-11-07vs JRust (Windyrush)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSameena Hassan / Julie Hollifield vs Angela Benson / Jessica Outterson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-11-04vs JBeasley/STo (OP)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Leonnig / Julie Hollifield vs Jenni Beasley / Sandra To2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women; Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Julie Hollifield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Sameena Hassan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Brooke Leonnig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Hollifield + Brooke Leonnig243148% games+1.5% vs expected
Julie Hollifield + Sameena Hassan71448% games−0.3% vs expected
Sameena Hassan + Brooke Leonnig102444% games−5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Julie Hollifield
103W–115L career · 9 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Sameena Hassan
42W–69L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Brooke Leonnig
134W–149L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.