Teams

NMiller (OPRC) op flexors

2023-2024 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 4.0 Women; Evening

3 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesBrooke Grindle / Kelly Floyd vs Becca Donaldson / Pamela Burks6-1, 6-2
2024-01-18vs ABarrett/STorres (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Niess / Brooke Grindle vs Sandra Torres / Kristin Kapur6-0, 6-4
2024-01-14vs SReynolds (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Floyd / Sarah Niess vs Stefanie Reynolds / Mindy Merchant6-2, 6-1
2024-01-03vs CWaldrop/CPeterson (Lifetime)Won 10
W#1 DoublesNan Miller / Sarah Niess vs Cynthia Waldrop / Lee Page6-1, 6-4
2023-12-05vs BLeonnig (CSRC) SFAMWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Niess / Kelly Floyd vs Brooke Leonnig / Julie Hollifield6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-11-15vs JRust (Windyrush)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Floyd / Sarah Niess vs Jessica Outterson / Janine Rust6-3, 6-0
2023-11-12vs JBeasley/STo (OP)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNan Miller / Brooke Grindle vs Jenni Beasley / Sandra To3-6, 3-6
2023-11-04vs OClaxton (Life Time) Tons O FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Niess / Brooke Grindle vs Nikki Haskins / Tonya Terry6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women; Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Sarah Niess
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Brooke Grindle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Nan Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Grindle + Sarah Niess314 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Niess + Nan Miller303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Niess
68W–29L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Brooke Grindle
46W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.84
Nan Miller
31W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.