Teams

Sports Mall-Kasteler/Johnson

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W PM

25 players · average NTRP 4.03 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJodie Monson / Megan Connelly vs Marie Goddard / Lee Chase0-6, 4-6
2022-06-02Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKristel Affleck / Megan Connelly vs Emily King / Mindy Dunyon1-6, 2-6
2022-05-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesRobyn Scharman / Jan Chamberlain vs Christina Eischeid / Krista Thompson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-21vs Liberty Park Tennis-Rich/RichWon 10
W#3 DoublesJan Chamberlain / Lindie Hoggan vs Kathryne Higgins / Aimee Nilson6-4, 6-4
2022-04-14vs Liberty Park Tennis-TaylorWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Koelliker / Jan Chamberlain vs Chandi Hurd / Olivia Hu6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.72
Zoie Black
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Amy Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.24
Karin Smith
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
4.16
Amber Jorgensen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.93
Alyson Ellis
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 4
3.85
Tiffany Kasteler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
3.81
Joanna Larsen
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
3.79
Taeeui Ham
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Susan Koelliker
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.77
Robyn Scharman
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
JaNae Smith
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.73
Jordyn Parry
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #1 Singles 18% · published 4
3.72
Megan Connelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Dorene Sambado
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.69
Gretchen Soffe
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Sherilyn Rawlings
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.65
Jill Ford
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Jan Chamberlain
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Regina Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 13% · published
3.61
Joanna Heiden
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.61
Jodie Monson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.39
Lindie Hoggan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Kristel Affleck
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Marce Miles
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Megan Rytting
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherilyn Rawlings + Jill Ford6159% games+13.5% vs expected
JaNae Smith + Regina Johnson9456% games+10.4% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + Kristel Affleck8461% games+7.8% vs expected
Jodie Monson + Joanna Larsen4459% games+7.8% vs expected
Robyn Scharman + Regina Johnson16756% games+6.1% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + Susan Koelliker311058% games+4.9% vs expected
JaNae Smith + Susan Koelliker3358% games+4.2% vs expected
Susan Koelliker + Jill Ford8557% games+1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zoie Black
23W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%4%96%
4.72
4.5
Amy Hansen
43W–44L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karin Smith
143W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Amber Jorgensen
114W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
4
Alyson Ellis
173W–47L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
Tiffany Kasteler
166W–104L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Joanna Larsen
42W–73L career · 8 lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.81
4
Taeeui Ham
95W–40L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Susan Koelliker
133W–81L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Robyn Scharman
118W–67L career · 9 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
JaNae Smith
221W–188L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Jordyn Parry
168W–127L career · 10 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Megan Connelly
46W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Dorene Sambado
102W–113L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Gretchen Soffe
79W–60L career · 8 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Sherilyn Rawlings
136W–64L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jill Ford
86W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Jan Chamberlain
50W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Regina Johnson
122W–100L career · 8 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Joanna Heiden
93W–99L career · 7 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Jodie Monson
144W–103L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Lindie Hoggan
58W–74L career · 4 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.39
3.5
Kristel Affleck
123W–116L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Marce Miles
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Megan Rytting
100W–30L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.