Teams

The Waves/Gee/Half Moon Bay

2025 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesNoriko Swanson / Fenny Widjaja vs Tina Baykaner / Clarissa Fung5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJillian Gee / Claire Toffey vs Michelle Nicholson / Yukari Seki4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTheresa Goodwin / Karen Toledo vs Keri Smith / Ronnie Yamanaka1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Gunnell / Fenny Widjaja vs Katherine Wu / Jennifer Fong7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJillian Gee / Claire Toffey vs Amy Jiang / Mae Hoad6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Toledo / Theresa Goodwin vs Christine Yeh / Suratwadee Lakornwong1-6, 2-6
2025-10-17vs SushiFighters/Kim/MoragaWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Gunnell / Fenny Widjaja vs Jennifer Essner / Caryn Lai6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Simnett / Jillian Gee vs Janell Mollenhauer / Martha Matrisian6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTheresa Goodwin / Minh Cannon vs Christina Fong / Jessica Edson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-17vs LOVE ALL/Kim/San FranciscoWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Gunnell / Noriko Swanson vs Kristine Dollard / Katherine Dowling6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSarah Simnett / Claire Sheehan vs Lisa Faber / Elizabeth Whipple6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Toledo / Minh Cannon vs Nina Kim / Colleen Sonneborn7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Fenny Widjaja
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Alexandra Gunnell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Noriko Swanson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Sarah Simnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Theresa Goodwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Claire Toffey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Jillian Gee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Claire Sheehan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Karen Toledo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Minh Cannon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jillian Gee + Claire Toffey4452% games−1.0% vs expected
Alexandra Gunnell + Fenny Widjaja6550% games−3.9% vs expected
Claire Sheehan + Sarah Simnett4843% games−5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Fenny Widjaja
23W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Alexandra Gunnell
29W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
Noriko Swanson
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.10
Sarah Simnett
27W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Theresa Goodwin
61W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.67
4
Claire Toffey
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Jillian Gee
27W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Claire Sheehan
16W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Karen Toledo
32W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Minh Cannon
61W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.