Teams

NorCal/Nicholson/Tri-Level3.5/4.0/4.5W

2025 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-18vs The Waves/Gee/Half Moon BayWon 30
W#1 DoublesTina Baykaner / Clarissa Fung vs Noriko Swanson / Fenny Widjaja7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Nicholson / Yukari Seki vs Jillian Gee / Claire Toffey6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKeri Smith / Ronnie Yamanaka vs Theresa Goodwin / Karen Toledo6-1, 6-4
2025-10-18vs LOVE ALL/Kim/San FranciscoWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Kim / Cathy Xin vs Kelly Sperry / Leigh Pagan6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKristen Johnson / Esther Chen vs Ally Gwozdz / Christy Wasserman6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMo Horthong / Ronnie Yamanaka vs Annabelle Frankl / Tam Tucker6-0, 6-4
2025-10-17vs SFTC/Lu/San FranciscoWon 30
W#1 DoublesClarissa Fung / Cathy Xin vs Lizzie Siegle / Helen Zhang6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVanessa Graciano / Yukari Seki vs Sandy Shepherd / Kelly Bennett6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRonnie Yamanaka / Keri Smith vs Marilena Gallotta / Jing Gu6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clarissa Fung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.61
Cathy Xin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.05
Tina Baykaner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Mo Horthong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Yukari Seki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Michelle Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Ronnie Yamanaka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Vanessa Graciano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Keri Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Esther Chen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clarissa Fung
12W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Cathy Xin
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
Tina Baykaner
24W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.05
Mo Horthong
52W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
Yukari Seki
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.93
Michelle Nicholson
45W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Ronnie Yamanaka
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.85
Vanessa Graciano
28W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Keri Smith
37W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Esther Chen
15W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.