Teams

SD LLW 4.5 UCRC/ Hwang

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - SDNC · SDNC

10 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-13vs SDNC 4.5 RPTC/ IshiharaWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew MacFarlane / Stuart Ridge vs Michael Donahue / Jesse Donahue6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEdward Dabu / Wender Hwang vs David Bracher / Samuel Conway7-6, 7-5
2022-11-06vs SDNC 4.5 Lomas Santa Fe/ BooneWon 10
W#3 DoublesAntonio Padilla / Stuart Ridge vs Kevin Pegels / Thomas Savides6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStuart Ridge / Antonio Padilla vs John Graber / Tomer Yehezkel4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-18vs SDNC 4.5 Fallbrook/ BallewegWon 10
W#1 DoublesNorman Granger / Stuart Ridge vs Ray Fisher / Brian Stevens7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Stuart Ridge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Will Garber
published 4.5
Christian Puscasiu
published 4.5
4.24
Andrew MacFarlane
published 4.5
3.92
Craig Noll
published 4.5
3.91
Wender Hwang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jason Hom
published
Norman Granger
published
Raymond Herr
published
Ronald Kao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew MacFarlane + Stuart Ridge6153% gamesnot enough data
Will Garber + Stuart Ridge4156% gamesnot enough data
Wender Hwang + Will Garber123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stuart Ridge
108W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Will Garber
93W–52L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Christian Puscasiu
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Andrew MacFarlane
13W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Craig Noll
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Wender Hwang
158W–79L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
Jason Hom
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Norman Granger
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Raymond Herr
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ronald Kao
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.