Teams

SDNC 4.5 Lomas Santa Fe/ Boone

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - SDNC · SDNC

7 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-04vs SDNC 4.5 San Dieguito TC/ FrommeSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKevin Pegels / Matthew Comyns vs Kraig Winters / Aran Wong5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesThomas Savides / Rick Jensen vs Alex Barnett / Chris Fromme3-6, 2-6
2022-11-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Savides / Matthew Comyns vs Jamie Wright / Michael Bui6-7, 3-6
2022-11-06vs SD LLW 4.5 UCRC/ HwangLost 01
L#3 DoublesKevin Pegels / Thomas Savides vs Antonio Padilla / Stuart Ridge4-6, 2-6
2022-10-23vs SDNC 4.5 Fallbrook/ BallewegWon 10
W#1 DoublesJacob Boone / Matthew Comyns vs Peter Vanderhyden / Ray Fisher6-3, 6-1
2022-10-09vs SDNC 4.5 RPTC/ IshiharaSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMatthew Comyns / Anthony Cooper vs Peter Armstrong / David Bracher6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesThomas Savides / Rick Jensen vs Steven Pineda / Samuel Conway4-6, 4-6
2022-09-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Comyns / Rick Jensen vs Pajseu Lochungvu / Teofilo Beltran6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesThomas Savides / Matthew Comyns vs ALEXANDRE COLAS / Chad Basinger2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Abe Roder
published 4.5
4.30
Jacob Boone
published 4.5
4.13
Grant Watkins
published 4.5
4.09
Matthew Comyns
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.58
Thomas Savides
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Kevin Pegels
published
Kie Wilcox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Comyns + Thomas Savides01131% gamesnot enough data
Jacob Boone + Grant Watkins213 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Pegels + Thomas Savides033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abe Roder
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Jacob Boone
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Grant Watkins
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.13
4.5
Matthew Comyns
35W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Thomas Savides
23W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Kevin Pegels
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kie Wilcox
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.