Teams

SGV Scholl Sistas- Brandon-Scholl/SA9

2022 Adult Division - 55 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SGV - Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Helen McCusker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Jo Ann Thrailkill
published
3.29
Mindy Schiffman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Gloria Nuguid
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Sanja Morris
published
3.03
Andrea Hutchman
published 3.5
2.94
Maryann Brandon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.74
Sharon Spangler
published
2.72
Jacqueline Bobo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Christiana Liu
published 3
2.65
2.50
Patricia Francisco
published
2.44
Andrea Crum
published 3
Juliet Amenta
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maryann Brandon + Mindy Schiffman10755% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Spangler + Christiana Liu314 matchesnot enough data
Jo Ann Thrailkill + Helen McCusker314 matchesnot enough data
Maryann Brandon + Kathleen Foy-Asaro213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Helen McCusker
76W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.46
Jo Ann Thrailkill
34W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Mindy Schiffman
84W–100L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Gloria Nuguid
113W–98L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
172W–163L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Sanja Morris
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Andrea Hutchman
3W–14L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Maryann Brandon
94W–139L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
Sharon Spangler
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Jacqueline Bobo
30W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Christiana Liu
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Christina Buckley
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Patricia Francisco
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Andrea Crum
1W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.44
Juliet Amenta
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.