Teams

Pell City-Stokes

2025 Ann · Gadsden

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-24vs Pell City- SweatmanLost 02
L#2 DoublesNora Stokes / Ethel Morris vs LoJuana Parker / JoAnn Wakefield1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWinny Pedraza de Chacon / LALA RANDLE vs Stephanie Fischer / Karen Estes2-6, 5-7
2025-03-17vs Pell City- SweatmanLost 02
L#2 DoublesJoy Mullins / Linda Williamson vs JoAnn Wakefield / Jan Sweatman4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLALA RANDLE / LISA PHILLIPS vs Paula Gragg / Stephanie Fischer1-6, 3-6
2025-03-10Split 11
L#1 DoublesEthel Morris / Kathy Parnell vs Christine Smith / Susan Bradt1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLALA RANDLE / Joy Mullins vs Jan Sweatman / Channing Carder6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Williamson / Joy Mullins vs Jan Sweatman / Channing Carder6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-02-24vs Pell City- SweatmanLost 01
L#2 DoublesNora Stokes / Linda Williamson vs LoJuana Parker / JoAnn Wakefield3-6, 1-6
2025-02-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNora Stokes / LALA RANDLE vs Paula Gragg / Leslie Warren6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Gadsden have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Kim Tipton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Angela Weissgerber
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.62
Nora Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.48
Winny Pedraza de Chacon
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.32
Kathy Parnell
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ethel Morris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Joy Mullins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
LALA RANDLE
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
LISA PHILLIPS
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Weissgerber + Kathy Parnell213 matchesnot enough data
Angela Weissgerber + Nora Stokes033 matchesnot enough data
Winny Pedraza de Chacon + Kathy Parnell303 matchesnot enough data
Nora Stokes + Ethel Morris213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Tipton
16W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.03
3
Angela Weissgerber
11W–17L career · 13 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Nora Stokes
14W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Winny Pedraza de Chacon
8W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Kathy Parnell
12W–7L career · 12 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Ethel Morris
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joy Mullins
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
LALA RANDLE
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
LISA PHILLIPS
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Williamson
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.