Teams

Pell City- Sweatman

2025 Ann · Gadsden

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-24vs Pell City-StokesWon 10
W#2 DoublesLoJuana Parker / JoAnn Wakefield vs Nora Stokes / Ethel Morris6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-17vs Pell City-StokesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLoJuana Parker / Susan Bradt vs Kathy Parnell / Angela Weissgerber6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoAnn Wakefield / Jan Sweatman vs Joy Mullins / Linda Williamson6-4, 6-3
2025-02-24vs Pell City-StokesWon 10
W#2 DoublesLoJuana Parker / JoAnn Wakefield vs Nora Stokes / Linda Williamson6-3, 6-1
2025-02-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Murrell / JoAnn Wakefield vs Kim Tipton / Kathy Parnell3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Gadsden have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Laura Murrell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Leslie Warren
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.44
Karen Estes
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
Channing Carder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jan Sweatman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
JoAnn Wakefield
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
LoJuana Parker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Paula Gragg
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Stephanie Fischer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Bradt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Warren + Karen Estes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Murrell
28W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Leslie Warren
3W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.45
Karen Estes
10W–15L career · 12 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.44
2.5
Channing Carder
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jan Sweatman
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
JoAnn Wakefield
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
LoJuana Parker
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Gragg
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Fischer
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Bradt
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.