Teams

OC LLW Body Shots - SAHS- Francesco

2022 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 4.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#2 DoublesTai Sisson / Andrew Huynh vs Adeline Arjad Cook / Mel Schantz6-1, 6-3
2022-03-27vs OC Mixed Troubles - LNRC - MehtaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNhan Do / Tai Sisson vs Alissa Ahlman / Daniel Beres7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTanner Sirota / Madeline Segura vs Stephen Vangelos / Erynne Mercado3-6, 6-7
2022-02-26vs OC Mixed Troubles - LNRC - MehtaWon 10
W#2 DoublesEric Nguyen / Catherine Areklett vs Dustin Hladek / Amanda Varela6-0, 6-3
2022-02-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKevin Tu / Madeline Segura vs Anne Nicholson / Robert Carlton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-02-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesCatherine Areklett / Eric Nguyen vs Bradley Fisher / Michelle Maddox6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesEric Nguyen / Catherine Areklett vs Emily Wu / John Rabalais6-0, 6-0
2022-02-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesHsin En Liang / Catherine Areklett vs Beth Campbell / Scott Moore6-2, 6-1
2022-01-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesEric Nguyen / Tai Sisson vs Jeffrey Chen / Lauren Lifson6-0, 6-1
2022-01-15vs OC - LPC - BlancoWon 20
W#1 DoublesLee Nguyen / Madeline Segura vs Elisabeth Marks / Chuck Ives7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEric Nguyen / Tai Sisson vs Marc Roest / Anne Nicholson6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Madeline Segura
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.65
Kyle Vo
published
4.53
Kristina Ebon
published 5
4.42
Cindy Shin
published 4.5
4.35
Tai Sisson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
Francesco Nguyen
published 5
4.27
Catherine Areklett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.15
Nhan Do
published
3.87
Kevin Tu
published
Megan Heneghan
published
Tanner Sirota
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Madeline Segura
39W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kyle Vo
16W–16L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.65
5
Kristina Ebon
133W–42L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.53
4.5
Cindy Shin
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Tai Sisson
249W–74L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
4.35
5
Francesco Nguyen
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
4.30
4.5
Catherine Areklett
18W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
Nhan Do
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
4.15
Kevin Tu
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
3.87
Megan Heneghan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tanner Sirota
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.