Teams

VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-13vs WILLOW PASS PK CW7.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Gwynn / Carmen Duarte vs Charlotte Fisher / Theresa Goodwin3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRene Conroy / Elizabeth Leach vs Donna Vis / Christine Start1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesValerie Fung-A-Ling / Claudia Polidori vs Olga Regal / Eufemia Rosales5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Ana Larner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Valerie Fung-A-Ling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Jeri Feuer
published
3.53
Rene Conroy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Susan Gwynn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Dolores Schmidt
published
3.32
Karen Pearson
published
3.30
Gail Pearson
published
Cheryl Enos
published 3.5
3.23
Lisa Saporito
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Kendall Calvert
published
3.17
Corrine Christensen
published 3.5
3.12
Claudia Polidori
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Wendy Schofield
published
2.84
Carmen Duarte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Leach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sandy Harrington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Schofield + Kendall Calvert2348% games−1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ana Larner
42W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.03
Valerie Fung-A-Ling
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Jeri Feuer
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Rene Conroy
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Susan Gwynn
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Dolores Schmidt
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
Karen Pearson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.32
Gail Pearson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.30
3.5
Cheryl Enos
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Saporito
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kendall Calvert
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Corrine Christensen
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Claudia Polidori
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Wendy Schofield
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Carmen Duarte
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.84
Elizabeth Leach
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Harrington
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.