Teams

SGV Maple Team-Lin-WN-SU10

2026 Adult Division - 40& Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-14vs SGV ATCC Rising-Rivas-ATCC/SA12Split 22
L#1 DoublesJacky Lin / Miguel Ortiz-Reyes vs Gary Tsay / Phillip Lee5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSimon Kim vs Joseph Widman2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Ko / Andrew Yao vs Dave Sparks / Andy Miller5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYim Tse / Daniel Kanemoto vs Jon Foran / Won Cho6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-02-16vs SGV Dare Doubles-Maroun-WN/SA2Won 40
W#1 DoublesJohn Proulx / Hugh Allen vs Peter Yen / Ricky Jalandoni6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesStever Leung vs Sam Qian6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Ko / Andrew Yao vs Lionel Ochoa / Dusty Summers6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMiguel Ortiz-Reyes / Hung Ho vs Ben Lu / Jon Pang6-2, 6-3
2026-01-18vs SGV ATCC Rising-Rivas-ATCC/SA12Won 40
W#1 DoublesJudd Tongprajiad / Jefferson Law vs Dave Sparks / John Tatoulian3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSimon Kim vs Joseph Widman6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPhilip Phung / Dave Kang vs Phillip Lee / Gary Tsay6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGerardo Emanuel Koropesky / Hao Truong vs Dave DeCsepel / Reno Yu7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Stever Leung
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.87
Daniel Kanemoto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Judd Tongprajiad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Simon Kim
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.81
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
William Ko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Philip Phung
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Dave Kang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Andrew Yao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
David Kim
published 4
Hung Ho
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Hugh Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Gerardo Emanuel Koropesky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Hao Truong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Jacky Lin
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Jefferson Law
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Proulx
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Yim Tse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Proulx + Daniel Kanemoto314 matchesnot enough data
Hao Truong + Daniel Kanemoto303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stever Leung
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Daniel Kanemoto
23W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
Judd Tongprajiad
15W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.87
Simon Kim
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
29W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.81
William Ko
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Philip Phung
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Dave Kang
138W–129L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Andrew Yao
19W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
David Kim
8W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Hung Ho
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Hugh Allen
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Gerardo Emanuel Koropesky
2W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Hao Truong
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Jacky Lin
20W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
Jefferson Law
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Proulx
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Yim Tse
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.