Teams

BLACKHAWK CC 40AM3.5A

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-18Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDavid Ly vs Venkat Venkataraman1-6, 3-6
2023-03-17vs ROUND HILL CC 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshok Ganesan / David Ly vs Stephen Hedden / John Gilchrist7-6, 6-0
2023-03-02vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5BSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSurinder Yadav / Scott Takishita vs Raghupal Bejjanki / Neerajkumar Chourasia4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Ly / Seth Catalli vs Narayana Rao Surapaneni / Vamsikrishna Paladugu6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-25vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5DLost 01
L#2 DoublesNathan Duda / David Ly vs Jonathan Indick / Ariel Santos1-6, 4-6
2023-02-19vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesSurinder Yadav / Scott Takishita vs Shantanu Chakraborty / Pritesh Dasgupta6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSurinder Yadav / David Ly vs Steve Heninger / Vishal Shenoy0-6, 3-6
2023-01-22vs RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40AM3.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Ly / Surinder Yadav vs Sergio Castillo / Kyle Jones1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Ly / Surinder Yadav vs Steve Heninger / Vishal Shenoy1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Ashok Ganesan
published 3.5
3.54
Thomas Lee
published
3.32
Scott Takishita
published
3.32
Saurabh Shrivastava
published
3.27
David Hsieh
published 3.5
3.27
David Ly
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
Surinder Yadav
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.23
Melvin Chua
published
3.18
Gregory de la Pena
published 3.5
2.52
Andy Lee
published 3
Jingjun JJ Cao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Ly + Surinder Yadav5644% gamesnot enough data
David Ly + Gregory de la Pena033 matchesnot enough data
Saurabh Shrivastava + Gregory de la Pena123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashok Ganesan
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.55
Thomas Lee
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
Scott Takishita
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Saurabh Shrivastava
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
David Hsieh
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
David Ly
48W–84L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Surinder Yadav
26W–31L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melvin Chua
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Gregory de la Pena
3W–17L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Andy Lee
6W–22L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
2.52
Jingjun JJ Cao
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.