Teams

Pair Jordans

2025 Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Saad Zarhloul vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-10vs DJ KittenLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Fu / Steven Park vs Bradley Kesling / Bobby Shore4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSergio Sanchez Zufferey vs Brian Fisher1-6, 0-6
2025-05-04vs Grand SlammersLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Lee / Ivan Kozliak vs Brayden Cohen / Glen Medina7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-27vs Highly StrungWon 10
W#1 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Christopher Lee vs Ryan Rohn / Warren Zhang6-3, 6-4
2025-04-13vs The Break PointersLost 03
L#1 DoublesSergio Sanchez Zufferey / Christopher Fu vs George Lettis / Luke Wedge4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesScott Kahan vs ShiMing Chen3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHernan Otano / Surendra Babu vs Brian Kim / DONG YOON SHIN1-6, 4-6
2025-04-06vs Cedar SprintLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Field / Ivan Kozliak vs Aaron Ohmer / Ben Winik4-6, 5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ben Vonachen
published 4
Christopher Lee
published 4
3.60
Ivan Kozliak
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Surendra Babu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Steven Park
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
David Field
published 3.5
Christopher Fu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Adriene Jordan
published 3.5
Hernan Otano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Saad Zarhloul
published
Scott Kahan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sergio Sanchez Zufferey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ben Vonachen
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christopher Lee
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Ivan Kozliak
300W–286L career · 8 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Surendra Babu
28W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Steven Park
57W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
David Field
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Christopher Fu
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Adriene Jordan
19W–70L career · type S · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Hernan Otano
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Saad Zarhloul
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Kahan
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sergio Sanchez Zufferey
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.