Teams

Highly Strung

2025 Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-14vs BreakersLost 01
L#2 DoublesJordan Glashow / Robert Luftglass vs Terry Tate / Justin Romano3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-01vs The Break PointersLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristopher Bragale / William Bates vs George Lettis / Avraham Amram6-7, 2-4
L#1 SinglesNicholas Isaac Bamman vs Benjamin Weiser1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKyle Gustafson / Milin Iyer vs Luke Wedge / David Kidwell Slak3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Hong / Ahmet Kilic vs Jonathan Jones / DONG YOON SHIN6-3, 6-3
2025-05-18vs Cedar SprintLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Storch / Nicholas Isaac Bamman vs Andrew Maddocks / Ben Winik2-6, 2-6
2025-05-17vs Net AssetsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Hong / Milin Iyer vs Brandon Kondis / Kevin Tindle3-6, 5-6
2025-04-27vs Pair JordansWon 21
L#1 DoublesRyan Rohn / Warren Zhang vs Ivan Kozliak / Christopher Lee3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNicholas Isaac Bamman / Robert Luftglass vs Surendra Babu / David Brown6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKyle Gustafson / Daniel Hong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-20vs DJ KittenLost 02
L#1 DoublesJordan Glashow / Kyle Gustafson vs Brian Fisher / Sean Berman1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndy Bressler / Milin Iyer vs Bradley Kesling / Robert Padavick4-6, 2-6
2025-04-12vs Grand SlammersLost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Bates / Milin Iyer vs Sidney Gibson / Brayden Cohen4-6, 6-5
2025-04-06vs HitmenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKyle Gustafson / Jordan Glashow vs Angel Fernandez / David Neuman3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Bragale / Robert Luftglass vs Yong Kim / Juan Sebastian Lleras7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hitmen07141427219
2Highly Strung0791938255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Daniel Hong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
William Bates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Kyle Gustafson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Ryan Rohn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Tom Oda
published
3.64
Warren Zhang
published
3.59
Milin Iyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Robert Luftglass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Nicholas Isaac Bamman
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.47
Jordan Glashow
published
3.32
Andy Bressler
published 3.5
3.26
Ahmet Kilic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christopher Bragale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Amy Cahoon
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
Jason Olson
published
Robert Storch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Rohn + Milin Iyer3267% gamesnot enough data
Jason Olson + Andy Bressler3256% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Rohn + Robert Luftglass123 matchesnot enough data
Milin Iyer + Tom Oda213 matchesnot enough data
Robert Luftglass + Robert Storch033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Hong
32W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
William Bates
27W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Kyle Gustafson
52W–79L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Ryan Rohn
242W–218L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Tom Oda
59W–69L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Warren Zhang
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
4
Milin Iyer
99W–128L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
4
Robert Luftglass
69W–94L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
3.5
Nicholas Isaac Bamman
36W–28L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.48
Jordan Glashow
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Andy Bressler
58W–38L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Ahmet Kilic
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Christopher Bragale
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Amy Cahoon
179W–281L career · 11 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jason Olson
31W–30L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Storch
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.