Teams

40 Love

2022 DC WTA Singles · DC WTA Singles 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-24vs Serving LoveWon 30
W#1 SinglesKristin Quackenbush vs Claris Brock6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSusan Lapetina vs Courtney Watson6-3, 3-4
W#3 SinglesKatya White vs Jillian Marianos6-0, 6-1
2022-09-18vs Serving LoveLost 12
L#1 SinglesAriel Selwyn vs Kathy Crowley3-6, 3-4
L#2 SinglesNancy Siems vs Nicola Beddow3-6, 3-4
W#3 SinglesJemine Bryon vs Sharon Tompkins6-1, 6-3
2022-09-17vs Serving LoveWon 30
W#1 SinglesJenni Bae vs Kathy Crowley6-3, 1-2
W#2 SinglesJemine Bryon vs Courtney Holsworth6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesNancy Siems vs Sharon Tompkins6-2, 6-1
2022-09-17vs Serving LoveWon 20
W#1 SinglesSusan Lapetina vs Mia Piansay7-6, 2-1
W#2 SinglesAriel Selwyn vs Sharon Tompkins6-1, 6-2
2022-08-28vs Serving LoveWon 20
W#1 SinglesKatya White vs Dana Chladek7-6, 3-0
W#2 SinglesJemine Bryon vs Courtney Holsworth6-1, 6-1
2022-08-27vs Serving LoveWon 30
W#1 SinglesJenni Bae vs Kathy Crowley6-4, 3-1
W#2 SinglesJemine Bryon vs Claris Brock6-1, 4-3
W#3 SinglesNancy Siems vs Mia Piansay6-2, 6-1
2022-07-30vs Serving LoveLost 12
L#1 SinglesNancy Siems vs Dana Chladek4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJemine Bryon vs Jillian Marianos6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKatya White vs Nicola Beddow6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · DC WTA Singles 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
140 Love5316818147
2Serving Love3581631198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Jemine Bryon
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
3.74
Jenni Bae
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.66
Susan Lapetina
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.65
Ariel Selwyn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
Katya White
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kristin Quackenbush
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Nancy Siems
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jemine Bryon
56W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Jenni Bae
211W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Susan Lapetina
63W–70L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Ariel Selwyn
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Katya White
27W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristin Quackenbush
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Siems
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.