Teams

Serving Love

2022 DC WTA Singles · DC WTA Singles 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-24vs 40 LoveLost 03
L#1 SinglesClaris Brock vs Kristin Quackenbush3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesCourtney Watson vs Susan Lapetina3-6, 4-3
L#3 SinglesJillian Marianos vs Katya White0-6, 1-6
2022-09-18Won 10
W#3 SinglesMia Piansay vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-18vs 40 LoveWon 21
W#1 SinglesKathy Crowley vs Ariel Selwyn6-3, 4-3
W#2 SinglesNicola Beddow vs Nancy Siems6-3, 4-3
L#3 SinglesSharon Tompkins vs Jemine Bryon1-6, 3-6
2022-09-17vs 40 LoveLost 02
L#1 SinglesMia Piansay vs Susan Lapetina6-7, 1-2
L#2 SinglesSharon Tompkins vs Ariel Selwyn1-6, 2-6
2022-09-17vs 40 LoveLost 02
L#1 SinglesKathy Crowley vs Jenni Bae3-6, 2-1
L#3 SinglesSharon Tompkins vs Nancy Siems2-6, 1-6
2022-08-28vs 40 LoveLost 01
L#1 SinglesDana Chladek vs Katya White6-7, 0-3
2022-08-27vs 40 LoveLost 03
L#1 SinglesKathy Crowley vs Jenni Bae4-6, 1-3
L#2 SinglesClaris Brock vs Jemine Bryon1-6, 3-4
L#3 SinglesMia Piansay vs Nancy Siems2-6, 1-6
2022-07-30vs 40 LoveWon 21
W#1 SinglesDana Chladek vs Nancy Siems6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJillian Marianos vs Jemine Bryon1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesNicola Beddow vs Katya White4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · DC WTA Singles 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
140 Love5316818147
2Serving Love3581631198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Sharon Tompkins
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.68
Kathy Crowley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.67
Dana Chladek
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.46
Claris Brock
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Courtney Watson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Mia Piansay
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Jillian Marianos
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Nicola Beddow
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mia Piansay + Claris Brock101053% games+6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Tompkins
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
Kathy Crowley
15W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Dana Chladek
166W–70L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Claris Brock
420W–275L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Courtney Watson
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Mia Piansay
244W–303L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Jillian Marianos
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicola Beddow
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.