Teams

Sh.Leaver18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-29vs Ke.Green18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKristen Wassel vs Keshia Green3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLaura Panebianco vs Vanessa Garrido2-6, 2-6
2025-07-22vs Er.Wynia18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKristen Wassel vs Sydney Chick4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesShannon Beach vs Naomi Rodrigues7-5, 6-3
2025-07-13vs Sh.Littleton18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesShannon Beach vs Shannon Littleton2-6, 1-6
2025-07-08vs La.Brown18SLost 12
W#1 SinglesAshley McCollum vs Margaret Ann Gonella7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSharyn Leaver vs Elizabeth Newton7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJacqueline Engle vs Julie Kelly5-7, 0-6
2025-06-17vs Sa.Truitt18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKristen Wassel vs Erika Peterson4-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesLaura Panebianco vs Michaela DeSoucey7-6, 6-1
2025-06-10vs Ka.Barsness18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesLaura Panebianco vs Kari Barsness7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-03vs Le.Wright18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesKristen Wassel vs Natalie Regan6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Ashley McCollum
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Shannon Beach
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Mary Jo Nugent
published
3.40
Kristen Wassel
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Jacqueline Engle
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Sharyn Leaver
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.98
Laura Panebianco
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Teresa Rullman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Panebianco + Shannon Beach5261% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Wassel + Shannon Beach213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley McCollum
24W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
3.5
Shannon Beach
96W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Mary Jo Nugent
36W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Kristen Wassel
128W–83L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jacqueline Engle
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Sharyn Leaver
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Laura Panebianco
100W–119L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Teresa Rullman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.