Teams

Er.Wynia18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-29vs La.Brown18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesSydney Chick vs Stephanie Ferrell6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCary Armstrong vs Kimberly Durland6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-22vs Sh.Leaver18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesSydney Chick vs Kristen Wassel6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCary Armstrong vs Jacqueline Engle6-4, 6-0
2025-07-08vs Sa.Truitt18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesErin Wynia vs Christine Bass6-3, 6-1
2025-07-01vs Ka.Barsness18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesCary Armstrong vs Leah Curran6-2, 6-2
2025-06-24vs Le.Wright18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesSydney Chick vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCary Armstrong vs Natalie Regan6-4, 6-3
2025-06-03vs Sa.Overholser18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesErin Wynia vs Holly Camak6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Cary Armstrong
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.71
Jennifer Kuzma
published
3.64
Sydney Chick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Anna Kooper
published 3.5
3.53
Naomi Rodrigues
published
3.40
Denise Decandia
published 3.5
3.39
Erin Wynia
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Cari DeCandia
published 3.5
3.31
Katherine King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Decandia + Cari DeCandia3550% games+1.3% vs expected
Erin Wynia + Denise Decandia213 matchesnot enough data
Naomi Rodrigues + Cary Armstrong213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cary Armstrong
97W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Jennifer Kuzma
51W–68L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Sydney Chick
50W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.64
3.5
Anna Kooper
25W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Naomi Rodrigues
35W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Denise Decandia
121W–57L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Erin Wynia
185W–126L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Cari DeCandia
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Katherine King
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.