Teams

FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 40AM4.5A

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesBrian Heimbecker / Jonas Satuito vs Gary Means / Glen Lipka6-4, 6-4
2022-02-20vs MERVYN MORRIS PK 40AM4.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrian Heimbecker vs Todd H Waibel2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Heimbecker / Roman Olmos vs Gregory Duquesne / Richard Lobo6-3, 6-4
2022-01-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Heimbecker / Paul Dulac vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShawn Robinson / Brian Heimbecker vs Motilal Agrawal / Gregory Duquesne6-3, 5-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Roshan Vasudev
published
4.33
Jedd Segrist
published
4.30
Brian Heimbecker
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 5
4.29
Jeff Wong
published
4.28
Taylor T Leese
published
4.27
Eric Contreras
published 4.5
4.26
Roman Olmos
published
4.18
Shawn Robinson
published
4.03
Ken Marques
published
4.02
David Meacham
published 4.5
4.02
Michael Rennels
published
3.85
Kelemen Papp
published
3.65
Samuel Pleasure
published
Rick Kepler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Rennels + Samuel Pleasure213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roshan Vasudev
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
4.44
Jedd Segrist
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
4.33
5
Brian Heimbecker
367W–83L career · 5 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
4.30
Jeff Wong
18W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
4.29
Taylor T Leese
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Eric Contreras
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
Roman Olmos
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
Shawn Robinson
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Ken Marques
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
4.03
4.5
David Meacham
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
4.02
Michael Rennels
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
4.02
Kelemen Papp
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Samuel Pleasure
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Rick Kepler
21W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.