Teams

SDNC 8.0 FRCC/ Hackett

2026 Adult 55 & Over Summer- SD · SDNC WE

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-09vs SDNC 8.0 Rancho del Oro/ WalkerWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Yang / Nicholas Palmer vs Lich Le / James Emerson6-3, 6-2
2026-08-06vs SD 8.0 SDTRC/ ChannickLost 01
L#2 DoublesJason Graves / Marcus Serrano vs Scott Atwood / Sergio Gamiz2-6, 1-6
2026-08-04vs WC SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ AckleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Yang / Jeffrey Hsu vs Andrew Mikschl / Billy Arenas2-6, 4-6
2026-07-26vs SDNC 8.0 San Dieguito TC/ RubinWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Brownhill / Jeffrey Hsu vs Michael Urcelay / Matt Martin6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNicholas Palmer / Tim Hackett vs Steven Rubin / Daniel Patton6-3, 6-0
2026-07-12vs SDNC 8.0 El Camino CC/ GentryWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichael Hromadik / Marcus Serrano vs Steve Libby / Scott Guiltner6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmit Shah / Jimmy Atri vs Ken Moran / Dave Zulick5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-05vs SDNC 8.0 La Valle CC/ ManheimWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Brownhill / Jeffrey Hsu vs Joe Manheim / Jack Steenstra6-0, 6-0
2026-06-28vs SDNC 8.0 FRCC/ LozanoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMichael Hromadik / Marcus Serrano vs Cort Schultz / Jim Filicia7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAdam Loew / David Yang vs Howard Farfel / Harry Nam4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Michael Hromadik
published 4
3.90
Robert Brownhill
published 4
3.75
Jason Graves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Nicholas Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Steve Betterly
published 4
3.69
Adam Loew
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Jeffrey Hsu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Marcus Serrano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Jimmy Atri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Brownhill + Steve Betterly6163% gamesnot enough data
Jason Graves + Marcus Serrano224 matchesnot enough data
Marcus Serrano + Michael Hromadik404 matchesnot enough data
Robert Brownhill + Jeffrey Hsu404 matchesnot enough data
Robert Brownhill + Michael Hromadik314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Hromadik
51W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Robert Brownhill
104W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Jason Graves
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
Nicholas Palmer
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Steve Betterly
20W–12L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Adam Loew
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Jeffrey Hsu
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Marcus Serrano
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Jimmy Atri
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.