Teams

SDNC 8.0 San Dieguito TC/ Rubin

2026 Adult 55 & Over Summer- SD · SDNC WE

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-02vs SDNC LLW 8.0 Kit Carson/ PlunkettLost 01
L#2 DoublesTimothy O'Neill / Daniel Patton vs Bill Lenaway / Don Plunkett4-6, 3-6
2026-07-26vs SDNC 8.0 FRCC/ HackettLost 02
L#2 DoublesSteven Rubin / Daniel Patton vs Nicholas Palmer / Tim Hackett3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTimothy O'Neill / Brad Jacobs vs Steve Betterly / Scott Miller5-7, 1-6
2026-07-19vs SDNC 8.0 La Valle CC/ ManheimLost 01
L#3 DoublesEugene Hotta / Timothy O'Neill vs Tim MacDonald / Joe Manheim7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2026-07-12vs SD 8.0 SDTRC/ ChannickSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEric Harnish / Joe Woodward vs Marc Channick / Tim Pillow6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrad Jacobs / Michael Urcelay vs Sergio Gamiz / Nick Runde6-7, 1-6
2026-07-05vs WC SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ AckleyLost 02
L#2 DoublesDaniel Patton / Michael Urcelay vs Frank Hao / Bruce Nguyen2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRobert Froyd / Brad Jacobs vs Jeffrey Ackley / Jeff Speir1-6, 1-6
2026-06-28vs SDNC 8.0 El Camino CC/ GentryWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Patton / Joe Woodward vs Kien Tran / Richard Gentry2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-21vs SDNC 8.0 RBS&TC/ RamsayerLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrad Jacobs / Timothy O'Neill vs Ron Roberge / Robert Doolittle5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Eric Harnish
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Eugene Hotta
published 4
3.63
Daniel Patton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Joe Woodward
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Robert Froyd
published 4
3.43
Michael Urcelay
published 4
3.42
Craig Hauser
published 4
3.31
Brad Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Timothy O'Neill
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eugene Hotta + Robert Froyd2447% gamesnot enough data
Michael Urcelay + Robert Froyd134 matchesnot enough data
Michael Urcelay + Craig Hauser213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Urcelay + Daniel Patton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Harnish
18W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.03
4
Eugene Hotta
80W–107L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Daniel Patton
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
Joe Woodward
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Robert Froyd
77W–154L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
4
Michael Urcelay
35W–70L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.43
4
Craig Hauser
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Brad Jacobs
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Timothy O'Neill
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.