Teams

HMTC BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-01vs CSUWon 21
W#1 DoublesDonald Herriott / Richard Penhale vs Rick Wehmeyer / Jon Leydens6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBruce Malloy / Bobby Diaz vs William Ketcham / Scott Kunze4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMatt Badger / Chris Moore vs Bob Ripp / Scott Martin6-1, 6-2
2022-06-24vs HMTC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesMatt Badger / Bruce Malloy vs Steven Tucker / Keith Babcock4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBret Holcomb / Richard Penhale vs Mark Sundstedt / Kent Mueller6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKendal Sanders / Gordon Motley vs Glenn Gibson / Dennis Knopf7-5, 6-2
2022-06-17vs FCCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBret Holcomb / Bobby Diaz vs Robin Wick / Dan Johnson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRichard Penhale / Donald Herriott vs Tom Weller / John Verwys7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMatt Badger / Gordon Motley vs Gregory Gibbs / Rob Gray1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-03vs LTA YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesWayne Snyder / Kendal Sanders vs Jere Barto / Timothy Morneau1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBobby Diaz / Donald Herriott vs Richard Kilgore / Mark Bakeman6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGordon Motley / Richard Penhale vs Leonard Martinez / Matthew Martinez1-6, 1-6
2022-06-02vs HMTC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesBret Holcomb / Bobby Diaz vs Mark Sundstedt / Keith Babcock7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChris Moore / Gordon Motley vs Steven Tucker / Jeff Nyland3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWayne Snyder / Kendal Sanders vs Kim Bender / Glenn Gibson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-27vs CSUWon 21
W#1 DoublesGordon Motley / Donald Herriott vs William Ketcham / Joel Larner7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin McCrary / Chris Moore vs Jon Leydens / Bob Ripp0-3
W#3 DoublesKendal Sanders / Matt Badger vs Ernest Chavez / Michael Tyler2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-13vs FCCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBret Holcomb / Bobby Diaz vs Josh Shelby / Gregory Gibbs6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChris Moore / Wayne Snyder vs Jim Kelly / Don Walker6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBruce Malloy / Kevin McCrary vs Rick Lowder / Tom Weller3-6, 4-6
2022-04-29vs LTA YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesKendal Sanders / Wayne Snyder vs Timothy Morneau / Richard Stitt6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChris Moore / David Trumbo vs Mark Bakeman / Richard Kilgore7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Penhale / Gordon Motley vs Leonard Martinez / Dan McGlothlin6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTA YELLOW7118614179
2HMTC BLUE62141024217
3HMTC RED0861841271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Matt Badger
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Richard Penhale
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Bobby Diaz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Gordon Motley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.66
Bret Holcomb
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Donald Herriott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Kendal Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Bruce Malloy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
David Trumbo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin McCrary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Wayne Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donald Herriott + Richard Penhale10357% games+5.3% vs expected
Bobby Diaz + Bret Holcomb5258% games+4.7% vs expected
Matt Badger + Richard Penhale9459% gamesnot enough data
Bret Holcomb + Richard Penhale8359% gamesnot enough data
Gordon Motley + Richard Penhale4156% gamesnot enough data
Bobby Diaz + Donald Herriott213 matchesnot enough data
Kendal Sanders + Wayne Snyder213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Matt Badger
55W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Richard Penhale
99W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Bobby Diaz
29W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Gordon Motley
28W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Bret Holcomb
48W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Donald Herriott
32W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Kendal Sanders
57W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Bruce Malloy
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
David Trumbo
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kevin McCrary
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wayne Snyder
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.