Teams

HMTC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-01vs FCCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKeith Babcock / Mark Sundstedt vs Don Walker / Peter Corran6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKent Mueller / Steven Tucker vs Jerry Krygier / Brian Dunbar6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGlenn Gibson / Kim Bender vs Tom Weller / John Verwys0-6, 4-6
2022-06-24vs HMTC BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesSteven Tucker / Keith Babcock vs Matt Badger / Bruce Malloy6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Sundstedt / Kent Mueller vs Bret Holcomb / Richard Penhale1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGlenn Gibson / Dennis Knopf vs Kendal Sanders / Gordon Motley5-7, 2-6
2022-06-17vs LTA YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Sundstedt / Kent Mueller vs Leonard Martinez / Matthew Martinez4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Tucker / Jeff Nyland vs Richard Kilgore / Mark Bakeman4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKim Bender / Dennis Knopf vs Jon Messick / Ed Kellogg6-7, 3-6
2022-06-10vs CSULost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Tucker / Keith Babcock vs William Ketcham / Joel Larner2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMark Sundstedt / Gary Westlind vs Scott Kunze / Scott Martin7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGlenn Gibson / Dennis Knopf vs Bob Ripp / Michael Tyler5-7, 1-6
2022-06-02vs HMTC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Sundstedt / Keith Babcock vs Bret Holcomb / Bobby Diaz5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Tucker / Jeff Nyland vs Chris Moore / Gordon Motley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Bender / Glenn Gibson vs Wayne Snyder / Kendal Sanders5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-05-27vs FCCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKeith Babcock / Mark Sundstedt vs Dan Johnson / Robin Wick2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKent Mueller / Dennis Knopf vs Jim Kelly / Peter Corran2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDavid Fanning / Jeff Nyland vs Jerry Krygier / Gregory Gibbs6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-13vs LTA YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Fanning / Steven Tucker vs Mark Bakeman / Jere Barto1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMark Sundstedt / Keith Babcock vs Matthew Martinez / Timothy Morneau6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKent Mueller / Kim Bender vs Richard Stitt / Richard Kilgore0-6, 1-6
2022-05-06vs CSULost 12
W#1 DoublesKent Mueller / Steven Tucker vs Joel Larner / William Ketcham2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Fanning / Jeff Nyland vs Jon Leydens / Ernest Chavez6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGlenn Gibson / Dennis Knopf vs Michael Tyler / Robert Rubin5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · MEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTA YELLOW7118614179
2HMTC BLUE62141024217
3HMTC RED0861841271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Mark Sundstedt
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.40
Kent Mueller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Steven Tucker
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.15
Gary Westlind
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Dennis Knopf
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
David Fanning
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Glenn Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Nyland
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Keith Babcock
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kent Mueller + Mark Sundstedt2440% games+2.2% vs expected
Steven Tucker + Kent Mueller61844% games−2.2% vs expected
Gary Westlind + Dennis Knopf1540% games−7.2% vs expected
Gary Westlind + Kent Mueller2842% gamesnot enough data
Glenn Gibson + Dennis Knopf2642% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Knopf + Kent Mueller0730% gamesnot enough data
Keith Babcock + Mark Sundstedt2439% gamesnot enough data
Gary Westlind + Steven Tucker0536% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Sundstedt
25W–40L career · 7 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Kent Mueller
48W–108L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
4
Steven Tucker
37W–100L career · 7 lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.39
3.5
Gary Westlind
15W–62L career · 1 line in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Dennis Knopf
16W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
David Fanning
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Glenn Gibson
3W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeff Nyland
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Keith Babcock
6W–7L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.