Teams

K.MCKEE 55+

2023 Cap Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-05vs S.RABBYWon 20
W#2 DoublesDolores Quesenberry / Cindy Faltisco vs Nancy Baird / Dana Weiland6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeigh Magee / Sarah Mulligan vs Andrea Pfeiffer / Lizanne Johnson6-0, 6-0
2023-04-29vs M.Van Lokeren 55+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Sarah Mulligan vs Karen Conley / Beth Johnson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-26vs J.Lake 55+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSuellen Bailey / Laura Holt-Kabel vs Jennifer Bricker / Susan Fanelly3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJuli Korsnack / Annette Page vs Diane Werner / Andrea McCartney6-7, 1-6
2023-04-21vs I.Gesher 55Split 11
L#1 DoublesDolores Quesenberry / Suellen Bailey vs Cynthia Smith / Elizabeth Hensley3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShannon Powell / Laura Holt-Kabel vs Mollie Hodl / Carol Lekan6-2, 6-1
2023-03-31vs S.Greer/TaltonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPam Rigsby / Dolores Quesenberry vs Catherine Brawner / Jean Harrold6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Mulligan / Lynne Manweiler vs Barbara Kelley / Kimberley Matthews6-1, 7-6
2023-03-22vs I.Gesher 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesSuellen Bailey / Laura Holt-Kabel vs Elizabeth Hensley / Cynthia Smith7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnnette Page / Dolores Quesenberry vs Isabelle Homes Gesher / Mollie Hodl3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Sarah Mulligan vs Susan Dubach / Chandler Bastian6-3, 6-0
2023-03-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesJuli Korsnack / Leigh Magee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Laura Holt-Kabel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Juli Korsnack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Suellen Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Dolores Quesenberry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Shannon Powell
published
3.73
Karen McKee
published
3.68
Cindy Faltisco
published 4
3.68
Annette Page
published 4
3.60
Carol Muth
published 4
3.55
Lynne Manweiler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Ginger Sluder
published
3.53
Leigh Magee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Pam Rigsby
published
3.45
Sarah Mulligan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Magee + Sarah Mulligan1440% games−2.8% vs expected
Laura Holt-Kabel + Suellen Bailey14758% gamesnot enough data
Juli Korsnack + Lynne Manweiler9356% gamesnot enough data
Juli Korsnack + Suellen Bailey4551% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Magee + Lynne Manweiler1444% gamesnot enough data
Laura Holt-Kabel + Juli Korsnack4157% gamesnot enough data
Dolores Quesenberry + Juli Korsnack2349% gamesnot enough data
Dolores Quesenberry + Lynne Manweiler1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Laura Holt-Kabel
99W–44L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Juli Korsnack
99W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Suellen Bailey
158W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Dolores Quesenberry
66W–83L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Shannon Powell
15W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Karen McKee
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Cindy Faltisco
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Annette Page
19W–14L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Carol Muth
8W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Lynne Manweiler
90W–123L career · 3 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Ginger Sluder
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Leigh Magee
45W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
Pam Rigsby
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
Sarah Mulligan
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.