Teams

SunPro-Cardall/Oliveros

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.0W AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.11 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-28Lost 02
L#1 SinglesSierra Chamberlain vs Mary Diaz Gordon0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCari Cardall / Rosie Groesbeck vs Jamuna Nielsen / Ally Lyle6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-21vs Ace Athletics-Swalberg/HarmonWon 21
L#1 SinglesNancy Scoville vs Jennifer Madison6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSierra Chamberlain vs Wendy Conrad5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCari Cardall / Rosie Groesbeck vs Mary Jane Swalberg / Annette Ludlow6-0, 7-5
2025-05-14vs SunPro-Madsen/Wills-MitchellWon 21
W#1 SinglesNancy Scoville vs Natali King6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCeleste Livingston / Liz Donaldson vs Cyndi Madsen / Raquel Moss3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCari Cardall / Jennifer Brotherson vs Nicole Collins / Carrie Jensen7-5, 6-4
2025-05-07Split 11
W#1 SinglesNancy Scoville vs Carrie Larsen6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Holman / Rosie Groesbeck vs Rebecca Myers / Naomi Stroud-Peterson0-6, 2-6
2025-04-25vs Wasatch Hills-BallerinasSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Brotherson / Jana Okey vs Michelle Jenkins / Linda Lasater6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNancy Scoville vs Nicholl Doolin6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCeleste Livingston / Sandra Chamberlain vs Mary Sorensen / Tiffany VandenAkker1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Holman / Sierra Chamberlain vs Brooke Iverson / Jennifer Olson4-6, 4-6
2025-04-23vs Park City MARC-Krueger/YatesLost 03
L#1 SinglesNancy Scoville vs Megan Leonard7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCeleste Livingston / Rosie Groesbeck vs Kelly Krueger / Marcey Goldner1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesSierra Chamberlain vs Hillary Jeppsen2-6, 3-6
2025-04-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesCorinne Wudel / Jennifer Brotherson vs Amanda Johnson / Andy Andersen6-2, 6-0
2025-04-09vs Ogden-Olsen/CoxSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJennifer Brotherson / Laura Thorpe vs Pilar Olsen / Vicki Cox6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCeleste Livingston / Nancy Holman vs Emma Li / Sally Cantwell6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Corinne Wudel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Nancy Scoville
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Jana Okey
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3
2.93
Sandra Chamberlain
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.90
Liz Donaldson
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.90
Cari Cardall
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Sierra Chamberlain
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Chrissy Oliveros
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.82
Laura Thorpe
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Brittany Archibald
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Celeste Livingston
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Nancy Holman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Brotherson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rosie Groesbeck
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cari Cardall + Sandra Chamberlain8163% games+15.2% vs expected
Sandra Chamberlain + Jennifer Brotherson4262% games+10.9% vs expected
Cari Cardall + Jana Okey3253% games+9.3% vs expected
Celeste Livingston + Cari Cardall4356% games+9.3% vs expected
Liz Donaldson + Corinne Wudel8557% games+7.9% vs expected
Chrissy Oliveros + Liz Donaldson3448% games+7.2% vs expected
Corinne Wudel + Jana Okey151052% games+7.1% vs expected
Brittany Archibald + Corinne Wudel5260% games+7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Corinne Wudel
65W–47L career · 9 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Nancy Scoville
33W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Jana Okey
53W–44L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3.5
Sandra Chamberlain
84W–86L career · 7 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.93
3
Liz Donaldson
74W–89L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Cari Cardall
64W–91L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Sierra Chamberlain
11W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Chrissy Oliveros
77W–89L career · 13 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Laura Thorpe
50W–69L career · 7 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.82
3
Brittany Archibald
33W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Celeste Livingston
72W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
Nancy Holman
26W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.48
Jennifer Brotherson
28W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosie Groesbeck
17W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.