Search

Sierra Chamberlain

Provo, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
29 matches · 11W–18L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
2.95
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
74%
stay 3.0
26%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 93% stay · 7% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.88. Lower than today’s 2.95 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Provo · 3.0
6 of 8
UT · 3.0
59 of 109
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Sierra is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sierra has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.6% of games
3.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 51% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 43.5% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history29 matches
L
Brooke Curtis / Lindsay Andersen
2026-08-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Gouff
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Stephanie Webb / Christa Orozco
2026-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Gouff
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
L
Maria Pettit / Rachael Gilmore
2026-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Smith
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-2
W
Ashley Wright / Gelyn Pauly
2026-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ciaran Lamb
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-2
L
Courtney Archibald / Morgan Adams
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Cook
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-1
L
Tiffany Riley / Jenn Burgon
2026-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Chamberlain
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-1
L
Kelly Krueger / Lynette Maloney
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachelle Lee
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Kari Bergeson / DEANNA HADLOCK
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chrissy Oliveros
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Cimberly Willis / Blair Campbell
2026-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Dunn
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-3
L
Kyoko Jensen / Jennifer Madison
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carly Planck
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 5-4, 1-0
W
Crystal Nielsen / Alyson Kelly
2026-03-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Holman
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 4-2
L
Rachelle Lee / Stephanie Webb
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Andersen
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.