Teams

4.0 Team 1

2026 USTA Adult 18&over League - Abilene · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-14vs Hoke TeamLost 04
L#1 SinglesMegan Bontke vs Sofia Solorzano3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Bowles / LeAnn Doby vs Kristen Gil / Storey Moore2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSherry Stewart vs Derstin Crousen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Deshazo / Rhonda Hatchett vs Leslie Hutson / Stephanie Rushing0-6, 1-6
2026-07-13vs 4.0 Team 2Lost 13
L#1 SinglesHolly Deshazo vs Ashley Hall0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJamie Doby / LeAnn Doby vs Kelly Pointer / Linda Ueckert7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRhonda Hatchett vs Elizabeth Everett0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Bowles / Megan Bontke vs Cindy Walsh / Tracie Mauldin3-6, 0-6
2026-07-13vs 4.0 Team 2Lost 13
L#1 SinglesHolly Deshazo vs Ashley Hall1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJamie Doby / LeAnn Doby vs Linda Ueckert / Kelly Pointer6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesRhonda Hatchett vs Elizabeth Everett1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Bowles / Megan Bontke vs Cindy Walsh / Tracie Mauldin0-6, 3-6
2026-07-13vs Hoke TeamLost 04
L#1 DoublesSusan Bowles / LeAnn Doby vs Kristen Gil / Storey Moore3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Bontke vs Sofia Solorzano6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSherry Stewart vs Derstin Crousen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Deshazo / Rhonda Hatchett vs Leslie Hutson / Stephanie Rushing1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Bailey Hoke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
LeAnn Doby
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.63
Holly Deshazo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.46
Susan Bowles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Megan Bontke
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Rhonda Hatchett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.40
Sherry Stewart
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Jamie Doby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bailey Hoke
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
LeAnn Doby
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Holly Deshazo
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Susan Bowles
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Megan Bontke
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Rhonda Hatchett
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43
Sherry Stewart
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.40
Jamie Doby
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.