Teams

4.0 Team 2

2026 USTA Adult 18&over League - Abilene · 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-14vs Hoke TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesTracie Mauldin / Lana Bland vs Bailey Hoke / Storey Moore1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKelly Pointer / Linda Ueckert vs Kristen Gil / Sofia Solorzano1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Walsh / Karen Hart vs Ashley Smyser / Kylie Nelson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-07-13vs 4.0 Team 1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLana Bland / Karen Hart vs Laura Evans / Melissa Patterson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Pointer / Linda Ueckert vs Jamie Doby / LeAnn Doby5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Walsh / Tracie Mauldin vs Susan Bowles / Megan Bontke6-3, 6-0
2026-07-13vs 4.0 Team 1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLana Bland / Karen Hart vs Laura Evans / Melissa Patterson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Ueckert / Kelly Pointer vs Jamie Doby / LeAnn Doby2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCindy Walsh / Tracie Mauldin vs Susan Bowles / Megan Bontke6-0, 6-3
2026-07-13vs Hoke TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesTracie Mauldin / Lana Bland vs Bailey Hoke / Stephanie Rushing5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Pointer / Linda Ueckert vs Kristen Gil / Sofia Solorzano2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Walsh / Karen Hart vs Ashley Smyser / Kylie Nelson4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Cindy Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Bailey Hoke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Tracie Mauldin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Kelly Pointer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Lana Bland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Linda Ueckert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Pointer + Linda Ueckert2438% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Walsh
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Bailey Hoke
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Tracie Mauldin
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Kelly Pointer
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Lana Bland
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Linda Ueckert
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.