Teams

MC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-31vs LTC-M REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesRom van der Zee / Sachin Bhandari vs Max Coates / Jordan Zlotoff6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Bradley / Charles Snethen vs John Crook / Joe Martinez2-6, 0-6
2023-05-24vs BP REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesDon Anderson / Charles Snethen vs Brian Dino / Michael Gomez1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRom van der Zee vs Devin Powell1-6, 2-6
2023-05-17vs RHCC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Truchel / Charles Snethen vs Ryan Wither / Nick Hendrickson2-6, 1-6
2023-05-10vs NJ REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharles Snethen / Don Anderson vs Garrett Sailer / Ron Funderburke6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRom van der Zee vs Rafael Rosario3-6, 1-6
2023-05-03vs GLDN BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesRom van der Zee / David Sungelo vs John Bailey / Wayne Williamson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Chris Duncan
published 4
3.80
John Truchel
published
David Sungelo
published 4
3.73
Rom van der Zee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.56
Charles Snethen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.45
Andrew Adams
published 4
3.39
Jerry Neff
published
3.23
Jonathan Stein
published
3.15
Don Anderson
published
3.03
Stuart Adams
published
Jac Barben
published
Sachin Bhandari
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stuart Adams + Andrew Adams033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Duncan
33W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.95
John Truchel
21W–22L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
4
David Sungelo
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Rom van der Zee
63W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Charles Snethen
32W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.56
4
Andrew Adams
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.45
Jerry Neff
0W–18L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.39
Jonathan Stein
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Don Anderson
23W–27L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Stuart Adams
12W–45L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
Jac Barben
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sachin Bhandari
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.