Teams

Donahue/LR/Reb

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-09vs Watts/NLR/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesShiloah Kviatkovsky vs Sarah Sisco6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMadeline Donahue vs Angele Forrest6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesYerenia Adame Hernandez vs Amy Lane6-3, 6-2
2024-12-05vs Clark/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 SinglesMadeline Donahue vs Morgan Bridgforth6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSydney Breaker vs Hannah Lewis2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKara Oko vs Jennifer Dartez6-2, 6-2
2024-11-19vs Jedlicka/LR/LRACLost 12
W#1 SinglesShiloah Kviatkovsky vs Tiffani Jedlicka6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesKatelyn Lazenby vs Ashley Cliff2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesSydney Breaker vs Christine Althoff4-6, 3-6
2024-11-11vs Sullivan/LR/CCLRWon 21
W#1 SinglesShiloah Kviatkovsky vs Maeghan Overley6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLauren Shillcutt vs Bailey Pollock5-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesYerenia Adame Hernandez vs Casey Finch3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-07vs Johnson/Jacksonville/BPWon 21
W#1 SinglesKara Oko vs Amanda Mamula6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMadeline Donahue vs Rachelle Tracy6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesShiloah Kviatkovsky vs Malia Preston6-7, 6-7
2024-10-22vs Rutledge/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 SinglesKatelyn Lazenby vs Robin Reed3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesShiloah Kviatkovsky vs Melaney Gee6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesSydney Breaker vs Robbie Ward4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kara Oko
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.50
Shiloah Kviatkovsky
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 13% · published
3.23
Madeline Donahue
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.15
Sydney Breaker
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.14
Yerenia Adame Hernandez
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Katelyn Lazenby
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.11
Lauren Shillcutt
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madeline Donahue + Kara Oko3252% games+1.5% vs expected
Sydney Breaker + Katelyn Lazenby134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kara Oko
27W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
Shiloah Kviatkovsky
67W–40L career · 8 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
Madeline Donahue
35W–19L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Sydney Breaker
30W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Yerenia Adame Hernandez
29W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Katelyn Lazenby
14W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
Lauren Shillcutt
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.