Teams

SIMS:Kaplan/Collins

2022-23 NCT Tri Level Women · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-09vs FV:Queens of the Court:SansoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Kaplan / Leah Black vs Laurie Sansone / Rebecca Fishman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-18vs BSF:Double vision: Bratz/HoganWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlessandra Veronesi / Leah Black vs Mary Kate Higham / Sarah Stapleton6-2, 6-2
2022-11-03vs MRC:ZoldyWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Kaplan / Michelle Hiscox vs Jackie Zoldy / JoAnn Lopez6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-10-07vs FV:Level Up:Goodwin/KingWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Hiscox / Leah Black vs Jennifer Grant / Cari Anne Goodwin6-2, 6-4
2022-10-02vs BTC:Serves you Right:JeppsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacy Collins / Alessandra Veronesi vs Nora Hannigan / Celine Mende0-6, 2-6
2022-09-27vs GTC:Not My Fault:Eller/McAuliffeLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacy Collins / Elizabeth Kaplan vs Karen Eller / Suzanne Mc Auliffe2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTC:Serves you Right:Jeppson7070025
2BTC:Bloom Duo:Song/Moundraty6060242
3FV:Fisher/Chaho5252562
4SIMS:Kaplan/Collins4242648
5EHTC:Net Benders:Yazon/Mills4343665
6FV:Queens of the Court:Sansone4343765
7FV:Level Up:Goodwin/King4343766
8MRC:Luv Wins:Palanzo3333959
9MRC:Zoldy3434863
10GTC:Double Trouble:Weinstein/Miller2424868
11BSF:Bowers2424960
12SIMS:Chapel24241069
13GTC:Double Newbies:Siracusa/Prince25251176
14FV:Ace Kickers:McCormick/Harris25251179
15BSF:Double vision: Bratz/Hogan16161383

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Alessandra Veronesi
published 4.5
3.81
Michelle Hiscox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Stacy Collins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Elizabeth Kaplan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leah Black
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Kaplan + Michelle Hiscox5850% games+1.6% vs expected
Elizabeth Kaplan + Stacy Collins91248% games+0.5% vs expected
Leah Black + Elizabeth Kaplan4252% games−3.3% vs expected
Leah Black + Michelle Hiscox4157% gamesnot enough data
Leah Black + Stacy Collins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alessandra Veronesi
33W–18L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
4.05
Michelle Hiscox
80W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
Stacy Collins
95W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Elizabeth Kaplan
67W–101L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
3.59
Leah Black
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.