Teams

FV:Queens of the Court:Sansone

2022-23 NCT Tri Level Women · 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-14vs FV:Level Up:Goodwin/KingWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Sansone / Esther Aronson vs Jennifer Grant / Shea Kinney2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesEsther Aronson / Rebecca Fishman vs Katharine Miller / Stacey Weinstein5-7, 2-5
2022-12-09vs SIMS:Kaplan/CollinsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Sansone / Rebecca Fishman vs Elizabeth Kaplan / Leah Black6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-11-10vs GTC:Not My Fault:Eller/McAuliffeWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Sansone / Jennifer Mazzocca vs Karen Eller / Suzanne Mc Auliffe6-4, 6-0
2022-10-30vs BTC:Serves you Right:JeppsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Mazzocca / Laurie Sansone vs Michelle Liang / Nora Hannigan4-6, 3-6
2022-10-21vs BSF:Double vision: Bratz/HoganWon 10
W#1 DoublesEsther Aronson / Rebecca Fishman vs Katarzyna Bratz / Louisa Hogan6-3, 6-3
2022-10-04vs MRC:ZoldyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Sansone / Esther Aronson vs Jackie Zoldy / Julie Mooney7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTC:Serves you Right:Jeppson7070025
2BTC:Bloom Duo:Song/Moundraty6060242
3FV:Fisher/Chaho5252562
4SIMS:Kaplan/Collins4242648
5EHTC:Net Benders:Yazon/Mills4343665
6FV:Queens of the Court:Sansone4343765
7FV:Level Up:Goodwin/King4343766
8MRC:Luv Wins:Palanzo3333959
9MRC:Zoldy3434863
10GTC:Double Trouble:Weinstein/Miller2424868
11BSF:Bowers2424960
12SIMS:Chapel24241069
13GTC:Double Newbies:Siracusa/Prince25251176
14FV:Ace Kickers:McCormick/Harris25251179
15BSF:Double vision: Bratz/Hogan16161383

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Laurie Sansone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Esther Aronson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Jennifer Mazzocca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Rebecca Fishman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mazzocca + Esther Aronson6656% games+6.7% vs expected
Laurie Sansone + Esther Aronson241154% games+6.1% vs expected
Laurie Sansone + Jennifer Mazzocca91150% games+1.9% vs expected
Laurie Sansone + Rebecca Fishman81050% games+0.2% vs expected
Esther Aronson + Rebecca Fishman263349% games−2.8% vs expected
Jennifer Mazzocca + Rebecca Fishman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Sansone
112W–112L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Esther Aronson
159W–141L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.64
Jennifer Mazzocca
83W–110L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Rebecca Fishman
84W–136L career · 3 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.