Teams

NNM 4.0M LATC - Cunningham

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over League - NNM · 4.0 Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-28vs NNM 4.0M TCA - BarnesLost 14
L#1 DoublesShane Sasser / Robert Bustos vs Rick McCormick / Patrick Sullivan5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Sasser vs John Dubois6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesGregory Cunningham / Volney Hildreth vs Mark Friedman / Krishna Goradia2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesPeter Neate vs Eli Lee6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKyoung Ho Kim / John Pickren vs Andrew Barnes / Charlie Heimerl0-6, 0-6
2024-04-27vs NNM/Romero/18 & Over/4.0MLost 14
L#1 DoublesKaarthik Sundar / Peter Neate vs Alex Salmon / Brandon Mutz-Thomas6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Sasser vs Brandon Dodds6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGregory Cunningham / Jack Smithheisler vs Leo Qualls / James Reinauer2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKyoung Ho Kim vs Nathaniel Peck4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesVolney Hildreth / Dainius Skauda vs Nicholas Romero / Zachary Mufti0-6, 3-6
2024-04-14vs NNM 4.0M TCA - HowellWon 31
W#1 DoublesRobert Ecke / Peter Neate vs Christopher Howell / John Jewett6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKaarthik Sundar vs Greg Gates4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGregory Cunningham / Jack Smithheisler vs Andrei Vakhtin / Marc Tronzo6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKyoung Ho Kim vs David Baggerly5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-03-23vs NNM 4.0M TCA - HowellWon 32
L#1 DoublesShane Sasser / Jack Smithheisler vs Christopher Howell / Thomas Kricka7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRobert Bustos vs Matthew Cone6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Pickren / Joe McDermott vs Greg Gates / Edward Benavidez4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesGregory Cunningham vs Andrei Vakhtin6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKyoung Ho Kim / Yu Seung Kim vs John Jewett / Peter Burton7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Benjamin Sasser
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Jack Smithheisler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Gregory Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.72
Sean Stanfield
published
3.69
Peter Neate
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.65
Andrei Vakhtin
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Kaarthik Sundar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.56
Robert Ecke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Robert Bustos
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Yu Seung Kim
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
John Pickren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Dainius Skauda
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Joe McDermott
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.14
Sergey Kurennoy
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Kyoung Ho Kim
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Shane Sasser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Volney Hildreth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dainius Skauda + Joe McDermott1937% games−0.1% vs expected
Andrei Vakhtin + Sergey Kurennoy2941% games−0.8% vs expected
Gregory Cunningham + Robert Ecke1440% games−5.4% vs expected
Volney Hildreth + Yu Seung Kim2341% gamesnot enough data
Volney Hildreth + Gregory Cunningham224 matchesnot enough data
Volney Hildreth + Robert Ecke224 matchesnot enough data
Kyoung Ho Kim + Yu Seung Kim134 matchesnot enough data
Volney Hildreth + Jack Smithheisler033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Benjamin Sasser
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jack Smithheisler
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Gregory Cunningham
83W–73L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
Sean Stanfield
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
Peter Neate
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Andrei Vakhtin
9W–23L career · 8 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
Kaarthik Sundar
23W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.57
Robert Ecke
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
Robert Bustos
25W–72L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
Yu Seung Kim
32W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.39
John Pickren
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.31
3.5
Dainius Skauda
47W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
Joe McDermott
73W–85L career · 11 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Sergey Kurennoy
45W–93L career · 7 lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.14
Kyoung Ho Kim
17W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shane Sasser
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Volney Hildreth
12W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.