Teams

CSRC BARKER

2026 ITA MIXED - SOCO · MIXED 7.5 - ITA - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-08-16vs CSRC MCCOLLETTWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Siegel / Diego Medina vs Sara Breese / Nathanael Taylor6-2, 6-2
2026-08-16vs MEMPK HILTONWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Siegel / John Buerschen vs Michael Green / Heather Green6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNancy Barker / Hunter Renn vs Jessica Hilton / Ben Lowe6-2, 7-5
2026-08-09vs MEMPK HENRYWon 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Hill / Brooke Zielke vs Chris Enterman / Carolayne Henry6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Barker / Hunter Renn vs Austin Carpenter / Judy Flaherty6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeremy G Fagan / Nancy Siegel vs Wendy Rhoten / Curtis Crawley7-5, 6-0
2026-08-09vs CCW CONTRERASWon 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Hill / Stephanie Brock vs Erin Contreras / David Illsley6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Barker / Diego Medina vs Kele Hauke / Andy Field6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesZach Barker / Monica MacLiz vs Benjamin Butler / Emily Butler6-1, 6-2
2026-08-02vs MEMPK VOSSLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeremy G Fagan / Olivia Salmon vs Patrick Ramirez / Leanne Thompson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-02vs MEMPK BUGOSHLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Hill / Stephanie Brock vs Eta Santoro / Justyn Shaffer6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesZach Barker / Olivia Salmon vs Emily Ragauss / Jesus Fermin6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMiyo Park / Michael Park vs Faith Collins / Allen Wu6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-26vs CSRC MCCOLLETTWon 30
W#1 DoublesOlivia Salmon / Kenneth Thornton vs Sara Breese / James Robers6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiego Medina / Monica MacLiz vs Candace McCollett / William Stone6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrew Aronson / Nancy Siegel vs Jeff Kulich / Christina Bardsley7-6, 6-0
2026-07-26vs MEMPK HILTONWon 20
W#1 DoublesOlivia Salmon / John Buerschen vs Jennifer Mutka / Cody Hoggatt7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNancy Siegel / Jeremy G Fagan vs Heather Green / Russell Walters7-5, 6-2
2026-07-19vs CCW CONTRERASWon 30
W#1 DoublesKenneth Thornton / Monica MacLiz vs Emily Butler / Benjamin Butler6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Siegel / Andrew Aronson vs Andy Field / Erin Contreras6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiego Medina / Olivia Salmon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-19vs MEMPK HENRYLost 01
L#2 DoublesOlivia Salmon / John Buerschen vs Wendy Rhoten / Pat Pottger6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-12vs MEMPK BUGOSHWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Barker / Andrew Aronson vs Eta Santoro / Justyn Shaffer6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesZach Barker / Olivia Salmon vs Lisa Pennino / Jarek Markley6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMiyo Park / Michael Park vs Allen Wu / Faith Collins6-2, 7-5
2026-07-12vs MEMPK VOSSWon 20
W#2 DoublesNancy Barker / Hunter Renn vs Taylyn Warth / Joshua Voss6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Hill / Brooke Zielke vs Michael Blevin / Monica MacLiz6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.5 - ITA - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Nancy Barker
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.79
Olivia Salmon
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.77
Monica MacLiz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Nancy Siegel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Ryan Hill
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Andrew Aronson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Kenneth Thornton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Zach Barker
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Diego Medina
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Stephanie Brock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Miyo Park
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Olivia Salmon + Ryan Hill6170% games+22.7% vs expected
Nancy Barker + Zach Barker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Barker
54W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Olivia Salmon
56W–33L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Monica MacLiz
57W–47L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Nancy Siegel
39W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Ryan Hill
35W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Andrew Aronson
12W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Kenneth Thornton
26W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.48
3.5
Zach Barker
114W–81L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Diego Medina
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Stephanie Brock
30W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Miyo Park
30W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.