Teams

GF:Serves You Right:Boone/Mackay

2024 ECT Thames Valley Combo League · TV Combo 1

35 players · average NTRP 4.06 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-17vs OSB:OSB TV Combo:MartindaleWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesSigne Breeden / Laura LaCascia-Ehlert vs Vanessa Vitale / Gail Leon6-2, 6-3
2024-06-19vs COMO:Cinderellas:Welch/RahoWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesSerena Crawford / Signe Breeden vs Tamara Gorski / Elizabeth Savage6-1, 6-1
W#1 Female DoublesSigne Breeden / Serena Crawford vs Pamela McKiernan / Andrea Frickman6-2, 6-2
W#1 Female DoublesChristi Burton / Signe Breeden vs Pamela McKiernan / Anna Slopak6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV Combo 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 28 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Sarah Boone
published
4.26
Serena Crawford
published
4.26
Andrea Goetz
published 4.5
4.23
Christi Burton
published 4.5
4.19
Signe Breeden
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Melissa Page
published
4.15
Kerry Shay
published
4.12
Ann Lefler
published 4.5
4.04
Lee Fitzgibbons
published
4.04
Elisa Milano
published
3.96
Caroline Black
published 4
3.95
Jenny Shieh
published
3.90
Pamelia Parker
published
3.69
Lisa MacKay
published
3.67
Sharon Marczewski
published
3.67
Mary Barnes
published
3.66
Dani Woods
published 4
3.59
Janet Burton
published
3.42
Maureen Goodrich
published
3.41
Eleanor Tandler
published
3.34
Jill Fried
published
3.34
Catherine Dinauer
published 3.5
3.33
Kate Piironen
published
3.31
Kristen Rosecrans
published
3.20
3.17
Deborah Montenegro
published 3.5
3.14
Debbie Kelly
published 3.5
3.10
Leanne Jolin
published
Jessica Gardner
published
Jill Boffa
published
Leslie Palumbo
published
Linda Sachs
published
Nancy Lorenze
published
Sue Walden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Signe Breeden + Lee Fitzgibbons4166% games+23.5% vs expected
Kristen Rosecrans + Maureen Goodrich7068% games+16.2% vs expected
Sarah Boone + Andrea Goetz7359% games+12.0% vs expected
Signe Breeden + Serena Crawford11359% games+11.0% vs expected
Signe Breeden + Jenny Shieh5457% games+10.9% vs expected
Jill Fried + Eleanor Tandler7060% games+10.6% vs expected
Catherine Dinauer + Christi Burton7267% games+9.8% vs expected
Catherine Dinauer + Maureen Goodrich9062% games+8.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Boone
94W–75L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.29
Serena Crawford
39W–25L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Andrea Goetz
57W–41L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Christi Burton
49W–42L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Signe Breeden
144W–103L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Melissa Page
27W–18L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
4.18
Kerry Shay
48W–37L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Ann Lefler
55W–40L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
Lee Fitzgibbons
23W–24L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
4.04
Elisa Milano
27W–23L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Caroline Black
18W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
Jenny Shieh
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.95
Pamelia Parker
151W–81L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.90
Lisa MacKay
49W–36L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Sharon Marczewski
53W–38L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Mary Barnes
59W–47L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Dani Woods
132W–120L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
Janet Burton
48W–57L career · no lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
3.59
Maureen Goodrich
127W–66L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
Eleanor Tandler
24W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
Jill Fried
55W–26L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Catherine Dinauer
97W–72L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Kate Piironen
66W–49L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Kristen Rosecrans
69W–37L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Laura LaCascia-Ehlert
48W–56L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Deborah Montenegro
73W–63L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Debbie Kelly
61W–69L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Leanne Jolin
39W–50L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Andrea van Ostenbridge
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jessica Gardner
26W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jill Boffa
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Palumbo
61W–42L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Sachs
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Lorenze
10W–35L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sue Walden
12W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.