Teams

BRMST PINK

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-30vs TTA REDWon 32
W#1 DoublesCheryl Williams / Torey Kirkpatrick vs Jessica Kroupa / Casey Ahn-O'Connor6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMary Peonio vs Morgan Fischer6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Post / Megan Lee vs Madison Fischer / Janice Cook2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichelle Karr vs Lindsay Madden4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Ipsen / Carol Anderson vs Amy Butler / Heather Petryna2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-05-21vs CVTA GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesCheryl Williams / Margaret Bender vs Thelma Condon / Meredith Trowbridge2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMary Peonio vs Isabella Jacobs3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Anderson / Kari Diamond vs Jackye Whalen / Elizabeth Corujo6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Hertzenberg / Megan Lee vs Sarah Abernathey / Skylar Schutter3-6, 1-6
2026-05-14vs LTA-Q REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesSarah Hertzenberg / Megan Lee vs Lori Preston / Natalie Gilbert1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMary Peonio vs Sarah Downey3-6, 2-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Vue / Keelan Blazer vs Julie Benson / Tsugumi Richards4-6, 3-4
L#2 SinglesCheryl Williams vs Paige Schauermann2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesTorey Kirkpatrick / Carol Anderson vs Sara Campbell / Dena Stark6-3, 6-4
2026-05-07vs LTA-Q GREENLost 23
L#1 DoublesTorey Kirkpatrick / Margaret Bender vs Julie Stockert / Michelle Snyder2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMary Peonio vs Tara Tovar6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Hertzenberg / Ann Ipsen vs Megan Hayes / Ann Fitzgerald4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichelle Karr vs Amy Perez1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRachel Vue / Kari Diamond vs Jency Paul / Jen Hutman4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-04-30vs MEA PINKWon 32
L#1 DoublesCheryl Williams / Margaret Bender vs Gia Medeiros / Annika Paradise2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTorey Kirkpatrick vs Sarah Streett6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSarah Post / Megan Lee vs Colleen Harvey / Bridget Kelly5-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMary Peonio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRachel Vue / Ann Ipsen vs Valerie Weber / Kristen Brynestad6-4, 7-6
2026-04-23vs BCC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesCheryl Williams / Kari Diamond vs Jori Whitling / Amy Gilbride7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMary Peonio vs Ashley Rogers6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Anderson / Margaret Bender vs Anna Mark / Sarah Mills1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMichelle Karr / Sarah Post vs Brandi Lipton / Jil Cohen6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-16vs BTA-F GREENLost 23
L#1 DoublesTorey Kirkpatrick / Carol Anderson vs Payal Sathe / Heather Riley2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Post vs Ardith Falkner3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Williams / Ann Ipsen vs Rebekah Davis / Judy Therond4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesSarah Hertzenberg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Karr / Keelan Blazer vs Amanda Kapolnek / Eva Raschke6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings39 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WP GOLD7028718252
2BTA-F GREEN7027823262
3GAC GOLD6127819220
4SS-H GREEN6126925258
5WP-C YELLOW61251030274
6HRCA-N ORANGE61211434278
7KC-CC BLUE5121922217
8CACM BLUE52231226254
9HG TEAL52221330267
10SKY ORANGE52201537304
11CHCC BLUE42191127224
12KC-RH PINK42171329259
13ATC RED43211433286
14SS-LT ORANGE43201535309
15PCC GREEN43181736303
16HW BLUE43191636298
17PTC PINK43191638302
18CACM TEAL43171840331
19KC-RH TEAL34181738306
20SS-H BLUE34191638308
21LTC-M BLUE34161940318
22KC-RH BLACK34171842325
23GCC NAVY34171845347
24HFII GREEN34112453358
25MEA PINK25161940319
26GCC RED25152042304
27MEA GOLD25161943348
28GTC PURPLE25142146343
29BRMST PINK25142148335
30HW TEAL25132249354
31HIW RED25112450359
32HRCA-S YELLOW25122350349
33SS-LGT BLACK15121841302
34DCC GREEN1592146326
35WP SILVER16142147352
36FOX TEAL16112451349
37CP YELLOW16112453369
38PH NAVY0682248311
39PCC PURPLE07142147349

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Mary Peonio
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.34
Torey Kirkpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Cheryl Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.30
Kari Diamond
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Rachel Vue
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Keelan Blazer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Margaret Bender
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Carol Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Sarah Post
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Ann Ipsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Michelle Karr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.05
Sarah Hertzenberg
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.77
Megan Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Karr + Sarah Post4160% games+12.1% vs expected
Carol Anderson + Sarah Post8353% games+4.9% vs expected
Carol Anderson + Ann Ipsen3355% games+4.3% vs expected
Sarah Hertzenberg + Sarah Post12555% games+2.3% vs expected
Cheryl Williams + Sarah Post131150% games+0.0% vs expected
Carol Anderson + Cheryl Williams3251% gamesnot enough data
Carol Anderson + Torey Kirkpatrick224 matchesnot enough data
Ann Ipsen + Cheryl Williams224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mary Peonio
52W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Torey Kirkpatrick
64W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Cheryl Williams
145W–113L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Kari Diamond
42W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
Rachel Vue
33W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Keelan Blazer
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Margaret Bender
10W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Carol Anderson
64W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Sarah Post
106W–94L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Ann Ipsen
32W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.12
Michelle Karr
36W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Sarah Hertzenberg
69W–46L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Megan Lee
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.