Teams

LTA-Q GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-28vs LTA-Q REDLost 05
L#1 DoublesMegan Hayes / Ann Fitzgerald vs Julie Benson / Lori Preston0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Perez vs Carol Schwendener1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJency Paul / Janine Ledingham vs Lisa Maggio / Paige Schauermann2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSusan Rasmussen vs Sarah Downey2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Snyder / Mia Morrison vs Ruth Weinberg / Georgann Lott6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-21vs BCC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Marsh / Megan Hayes vs Amy Gilbride / Jori Whitling5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMichelle Snyder vs Ashley Rogers2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Fitzgerald / Susan Rasmussen vs Michele Dolan / Ashley Devery2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMia Morrison / Janine Ledingham vs Christine Gould / Brandi Lipton6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-14vs MEA PINKLost 23
L#1 DoublesJulie Stockert / Michelle Snyder vs Emel Gomulka / Kirsten Roeber4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCharlotte Marsh vs Allison Shors2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJency Paul / Susan Rasmussen vs Gia Medeiros / Annika Paradise6-3, 4-4
L#2 SinglesAmy Perez vs Bridget Kelly0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJanine Ledingham / Jen Hutman vs Beth Cendali / Kristen Brynestad6-3, 7-6
2026-05-07vs BRMST PINKWon 32
W#1 DoublesJulie Stockert / Michelle Snyder vs Torey Kirkpatrick / Margaret Bender6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTara Tovar vs Mary Peonio1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Hayes / Ann Fitzgerald vs Sarah Hertzenberg / Ann Ipsen4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmy Perez vs Michelle Karr6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJency Paul / Jen Hutman vs Rachel Vue / Kari Diamond6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-04-30vs BTA-F GREENLost 05
L#1 DoublesJulie Stockert / Charlotte Marsh vs Payal Sathe / Heather Riley4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJen Hutman vs Ardith Falkner1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Hayes / Ann Fitzgerald vs Eva Raschke / Amanda Kapolnek3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAmy Perez vs Kendra Seoane0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMia Morrison / Tara Tovar vs Jennifer Germano / Carolyn Baker1-6, 0-6
2026-04-16vs CVTA GREENLost 14
L#1 DoublesJen Hutman / Janine Ledingham vs Skylar Schutter / Isabella Jacobs1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Stockert vs Sarah Abernathey4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Rasmussen / Tara Tovar vs Linda Levy / Elizabeth Corujo4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichelle Snyder vs Meredith Trowbridge2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMia Morrison / Charlotte Marsh vs Thelma Condon / Linda Schutter3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Michelle Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.17
Susan Rasmussen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.15
Jency Paul
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Julie Stockert
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.10
Charlotte Marsh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Janine Ledingham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Tara Tovar
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Ann Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Amy Perez
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.81
Jen Hutman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Mia Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Megan Hayes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Rasmussen + Ann Fitzgerald3646% games−0.1% vs expected
Michelle Snyder + Julie Stockert8849% games−0.2% vs expected
Michelle Snyder + Charlotte Marsh4544% games−1.8% vs expected
Michelle Snyder + Jency Paul1444% games−2.0% vs expected
Charlotte Marsh + Julie Stockert41240% games−5.7% vs expected
Susan Rasmussen + Mia Morrison1444% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Snyder + Janine Ledingham134 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Snyder + Mia Morrison224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Snyder
26W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Susan Rasmussen
44W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Jency Paul
15W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.15
Julie Stockert
29W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Charlotte Marsh
14W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
Janine Ledingham
8W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Tara Tovar
30W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Ann Fitzgerald
28W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.00
3.5
Amy Perez
1W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.94
3
Jen Hutman
16W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Mia Morrison
34W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
Megan Hayes
14W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.