Teams

Team 2

2023 NOVA Adult 65 & Over Women · NOVA Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-23vs Team 1Won 20
W#1 DoublesMarion Dearth / Barbara MacDonald vs Daphne Fuller / Joan S Oelschlager6-2, 5-5
W#3 DoublesMaureen Bornholdt / Mary Griggs vs Diane Baird / Jill Leffler6-2, 4-3
2023-08-21vs Team 1Won 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara MacDonald / Marion Dearth vs Lu Ann Rubenstein / Rachel Fritz6-0, 6-4
2023-08-19vs Team 1Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarion Dearth / Barbara MacDonald vs Daphne Fuller / Sharon Tennyson6-3, 5-0
2023-08-15vs Team 1Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMarion Dearth / Barbara MacDonald vs Peggy Neils / Rachel Fritz2-6, 5-6
2023-08-11vs Team 1Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Zalkind / Marion Dearth vs Jill Leffler / Kim Leas4-6, 2-3
2023-08-04vs Team 1Split 11
W#1 DoublesBarbara MacDonald / Marion Dearth vs Susan Holberger / Sujin Testa6-1, 5-5
L#3 DoublesMaureen Bornholdt / Serena Brown vs Shirley Burdette / Rachel Fritz5-6
2023-07-29vs Team 1Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBarbara MacDonald / Maureen Bornholdt vs Peg Moyer / Kim Leas6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-07-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesTeresa Wallendjack / Mary Griggs vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-19vs Team 1Won 20
W#2 DoublesMarion Dearth / Barbara MacDonald vs Peggy Neils / Jill Leffler6-4, 3-4
W#3 DoublesSerena Brown / Teresa Wallendjack vs Shirley Burdette / Alice Hume4-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Marion Dearth
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.49
Sol Lopez
published
3.49
Stephanie Almeida
published
3.36
Maureen Bornholdt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Teresa Wallendjack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Julie Zalkind
published
Linda Walsh
published
Serena Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Bornholdt + Teresa Wallendjack033 matchesnot enough data
Linda Walsh + Teresa Wallendjack123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marion Dearth
56W–62L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Sol Lopez
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Stephanie Almeida
3W–14L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Maureen Bornholdt
72W–133L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Teresa Wallendjack
63W–89L career · 6 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
Julie Zalkind
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Walsh
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Serena Brown
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.