Teams

Gilchrist/Gabrielli: 3.5WBL 40+ ES23

2023 ADULT 40 & OVER EARLY START · 3.5 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-16vs Landrus 40+ ES23Won 10
W#1 SinglesTina Mcalpine vs Lisa Schurch6-4, 6-2
2022-11-02vs Brady/Ehle 40+ ES23Won 10
W#2 DoublesSally Gilchrist / Tina Mcalpine vs Laurie Ehle / Joni Bruder6-1, 6-2
2022-10-12vs Stordahl: 40 Something 40+ ES23Won 10
W#1 DoublesTina Mcalpine / Chanda Cook vs Pam Bowden / Kathy Cima6-1, 6-0
2022-10-05vs Stern: RTC Ladies 40+ ES23Won 10
W#2 SinglesTina Mcalpine vs Rabekah Simmons6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Margaret Creighton
published
3.70
Tina Mcalpine
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Chanda Cook
published 4
3.55
YI-WEN YANG
published
3.44
3.42
Carol Forsythe
published 3.5
3.34
Blair Pogue
published 3.5
Andria Galvin
published 3.5
3.19
Ann Gabrielli
published 3.5
Julie Zellmer
published
Lisa Pilla
published
Melissa Vander Louw
published
Sally Gilchrist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Forsythe + Chanda Cook5647% games+12.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Creighton
45W–47L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Tina Mcalpine
95W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Chanda Cook
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
YI-WEN YANG
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
Karen Heyer-Liljedahl
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.44
3.5
Carol Forsythe
29W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Blair Pogue
11W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Andria Galvin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Ann Gabrielli
24W–22L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Julie Zellmer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Pilla
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Vander Louw
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sally Gilchrist
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.