Teams

Village Walk Bonita - Macwilliams

2024 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-02-21vs Quail West - DavisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJill Brandenstein / Amy Schiffer vs Pam Davis / Jill Teberg6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Claire Ehrhardt vs Michelle Minor / Dawn Strang4-6, 2-6
2024-02-07vs Mediterra - VaccariWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Schiffer / Jill Brandenstein vs Sally Amato / Maureen Rennie6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-01-31vs Pelican Bay North - BehmaramWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie LeVan / Kristine Bergenheim vs Behnoosh Behmaram / Danielle Sherwood6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-24vs Ritz Tiburon - J. BrownSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMarcia Erpenbeck / Jill Brandenstein vs Jennifer Brown / Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Julie LeVan vs Marie Veintimilla / Aimee Hummel6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
SUE BECK
published
3.41
Marcia Kenyon
published
3.37
3.37
Mara Mazza
published
3.36
Alexandrina Covato
published 3.5
3.32
Amy Schiffer
published 3.5
3.25
Julie LeVan
published
3.21
Margaret Laggis
published
3.19
Jill Brandenstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Mary Beth Harley
published
3.17
Kristine Bergenheim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Marcia Erpenbeck
published
2.75
Claire Ehrhardt
published 3
Kellie Wagner
published
Sigalit Sphatt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Laggis + Marcia Kenyon10650% games−6.6% vs expected
Claire Ehrhardt + Kristine Bergenheim3253% gamesnot enough data
Mara Mazza + SUE BECK5064% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

SUE BECK
37W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.58
Marcia Kenyon
20W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
Katherine MacWilliams
32W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Mara Mazza
25W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Alexandrina Covato
23W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Amy Schiffer
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Julie LeVan
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Margaret Laggis
20W–16L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Jill Brandenstein
62W–69L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Mary Beth Harley
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kristine Bergenheim
38W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Marcia Erpenbeck
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3
Claire Ehrhardt
18W–41L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
Kellie Wagner
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sigalit Sphatt
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.