Teams

Mediterra - Vaccari

2024 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaureen Rennie / Annette McCann vs Lisa McCarthy / Patricia Reed6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-21vs Sterling Oaks - AldermanWon 20
W#1 SinglesSusan Berger vs DEBORAH Eck6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnnette McCann / Sally Amato vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-07vs Village Walk Bonita - MacwilliamsWon 10
W#1 SinglesSusan Berger vs Mary Beth Harley4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-01-17vs The Quarry - R. BlackLost 01
L#3 DoublesPaula Hartman / Susan Berger vs Laura Bertolo / Lynn Croteau6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-01-10vs Ritz Tiburon - J. BrownLost 02
L#1 SinglesSusan Berger vs Cecilia Trinh7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatricia Arthur / Annette McCann vs Jennifer Brown / Rachel Goode0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Diana DeFulviis
published 3.5
3.26
Candy Brunton
published 3.5
3.22
Charlene Ruccolo
published 3.5
3.22
Susan Berger
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Patricia Arthur
published
3.14
Camille Vaccari
published 3.5
3.11
Jennifer Amaya
published
3.09
Maureen Rennie
published
2.84
Annette McCann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ellen Davis
published
Paula Hartman
published
Rebecca Matarazzi
published
Sally Amato
published
Stephanie Bauer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Arthur + Annette McCann4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diana DeFulviis
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Candy Brunton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Charlene Ruccolo
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Susan Berger
92W–82L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Patricia Arthur
43W–32L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Camille Vaccari
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jennifer Amaya
24W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
Maureen Rennie
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Annette McCann
79W–101L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Ellen Davis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Paula Hartman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Matarazzi
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sally Amato
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Bauer
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.