Teams

DED: Dedham:Giannetti/OBrien

2026 EMA Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-16vs LAK:Lakeville:Cerro/BraytonWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Doo / Karen Etzkorn vs Cheryl Olivadesa / Allison Farquharson6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesArlene Iannella / Susan Greenfield vs Linda Armanetti / Thea O Donnell7-5, 4-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Lewis / Janet Giannetti vs Anne Marie Brayton / Cheryl Mitteness6-2, 6-1
2026-06-09vs LAK:Lakeville:Cerro/BraytonLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Etzkorn / Lisa Doo vs Christine Keller / Mary Nader4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Giannetti / Susan Greenfield vs Deborah Kylander / Kathy Schelleng4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChrista MacLean / Wenping Xu Quinn vs Cheryl Olivadesa / Cheryl Mitteness3-6, 5-6
2026-06-02vs LAK:Lakeville:Cerro/BraytonWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Etzkorn / Karen Lewis vs Thea O Donnell / Mary Nader7-5, 4-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesArlene Iannella / Susan Greenfield vs Deborah Kylander / Kathy Schelleng2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChrista MacLean / Janet Giannetti vs Jyl Collins / Allison Farquharson5-7, 5-4, 1-0
2026-05-26vs LAK:Lakeville:Cerro/BraytonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Greenfield / Karen Lewis vs Allison Farquharson / Christine Keller0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesArlene Iannella / Christa MacLean vs Cheryl Olivadesa / Linda Armanetti3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesWenping Xu Quinn / Randy OBrien vs Patricia Cerro / Elizabeth MacFarlane6-3, 5-4
2026-05-19vs LAK:Lakeville:Cerro/BraytonWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Doo / Karen Etzkorn vs Thea O Donnell / Cheryl Olivadesa6-7, 3-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesArlene Iannella / Susan Greenfield vs Rebecca Hjort / Mary Nader7-5, 3-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Lewis / Randy OBrien vs Anne Marie Brayton / Patricia Cerro4-6, 5-4, 1-0
2026-05-12vs LAK:Lakeville:Cerro/BraytonLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Doo / Susan Greenfield vs Thea O Donnell / Mary Nader1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Lewis / Janet Giannetti vs Jyl Collins / Rebecca Hjort6-7, 2-5
L#3 DoublesRandy OBrien / Christa MacLean vs Anne Marie Brayton / Patricia Cerro6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DED: Dedham:Giannetti/OBrien0611721166
2LAK:Lakeville:Cerro/Brayton0671124171
3NEW:Pinch an Inch:Bloom01024618231
4BRTC:Bass River:Collins/Evers010181228267
5SFTNA:North Andover:Stilianos/Czarnota010151534287
6LFW:Longfellow:van Riel/Kobata010141637290
7SFT:Spark-A: Ehlbeck010111944307
8ACT:Acing Gracefully:Markowitz/Howard01082249311

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Lisa Doo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Christa MacLean
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Arlene Iannella
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Karen Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.75
Janet Giannetti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Susan Greenfield
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Wenping Xu Quinn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Karen Etzkorn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Randy OBrien
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marion Fields
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Greenfield + Arlene Iannella6061% games+11.7% vs expected
Susan Greenfield + Janet Giannetti5159% games+8.6% vs expected
Karen Lewis + Janet Giannetti10263% games+5.3% vs expected
Marion Fields + Karen Etzkorn4353% games+3.0% vs expected
Janet Giannetti + Christa MacLean8161% games+2.1% vs expected
Janet Giannetti + Karen Etzkorn5654% games+1.5% vs expected
Susan Greenfield + Lisa Doo3356% games+1.2% vs expected
Lisa Doo + Karen Etzkorn11952% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Doo
48W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Christa MacLean
32W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Arlene Iannella
47W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Karen Lewis
34W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Janet Giannetti
63W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Susan Greenfield
62W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Wenping Xu Quinn
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Karen Etzkorn
46W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Randy OBrien
51W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Marion Fields
38W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.