Teams

LAK:Lakeville:Cerro/Brayton

2026 EMA Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.07 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-16vs DED: Dedham:Giannetti/OBrienLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Olivadesa / Allison Farquharson vs Lisa Doo / Karen Etzkorn1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Armanetti / Thea O Donnell vs Arlene Iannella / Susan Greenfield5-7, 3-4
L#3 DoublesAnne Marie Brayton / Cheryl Mitteness vs Karen Lewis / Janet Giannetti2-6, 1-6
2026-06-09vs DED: Dedham:Giannetti/OBrienWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Keller / Mary Nader vs Karen Etzkorn / Lisa Doo6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDeborah Kylander / Kathy Schelleng vs Janet Giannetti / Susan Greenfield6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl Olivadesa / Cheryl Mitteness vs Christa MacLean / Wenping Xu Quinn6-3, 6-5
2026-06-02vs DED: Dedham:Giannetti/OBrienLost 03
L#1 DoublesThea O Donnell / Mary Nader vs Karen Etzkorn / Karen Lewis5-7, 5-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Kylander / Kathy Schelleng vs Arlene Iannella / Susan Greenfield6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJyl Collins / Allison Farquharson vs Christa MacLean / Janet Giannetti5-7, 5-4, 1-0
2026-05-26vs DED: Dedham:Giannetti/OBrienWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Farquharson / Christine Keller vs Susan Greenfield / Karen Lewis6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCheryl Olivadesa / Linda Armanetti vs Arlene Iannella / Christa MacLean6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPatricia Cerro / Elizabeth MacFarlane vs Wenping Xu Quinn / Randy OBrien3-6, 4-5
2026-05-19vs DED: Dedham:Giannetti/OBrienLost 03
L#1 DoublesThea O Donnell / Cheryl Olivadesa vs Lisa Doo / Karen Etzkorn7-6, 1-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Hjort / Mary Nader vs Arlene Iannella / Susan Greenfield5-7, 4-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnne Marie Brayton / Patricia Cerro vs Karen Lewis / Randy OBrien4-6, 5-4, 1-0
2026-05-12vs DED: Dedham:Giannetti/OBrienWon 30
W#1 DoublesThea O Donnell / Mary Nader vs Lisa Doo / Susan Greenfield6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJyl Collins / Rebecca Hjort vs Karen Lewis / Janet Giannetti7-6, 5-2
W#3 DoublesAnne Marie Brayton / Patricia Cerro vs Randy OBrien / Christa MacLean4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DED: Dedham:Giannetti/OBrien0611721166
2LAK:Lakeville:Cerro/Brayton0671124171
3NEW:Pinch an Inch:Bloom01024618231
4BRTC:Bass River:Collins/Evers010181228267
5SFTNA:North Andover:Stilianos/Czarnota010151534287
6LFW:Longfellow:van Riel/Kobata010141637290
7SFT:Spark-A: Ehlbeck010111944307
8ACT:Acing Gracefully:Markowitz/Howard01082249311

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Christine Keller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.09
Deborah Kylander
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Linda Armanetti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Rebecca Hjort
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Jyl Collins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Allison Farquharson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Anne Marie Brayton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Cheryl Olivadesa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Thea O Donnell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Mary Nader
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Patricia Cerro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Cheryl Mitteness
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Pamela Feeney
published
3.50
Elizabeth MacFarlane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Kathy Schelleng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Margaret Hart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Kylander + Cheryl Mitteness4261% games+16.1% vs expected
Rebecca Hjort + Cheryl Mitteness22467% games+10.8% vs expected
Mary Nader + Cheryl Olivadesa10261% games+7.5% vs expected
Christine Keller + Cheryl Olivadesa11070% games+7.1% vs expected
Deborah Kylander + Allison Farquharson4249% gamesnot enough data
Linda Armanetti + Jyl Collins4168% gamesnot enough data
Christine Keller + Mary Nader314 matchesnot enough data
Anne Marie Brayton + Patricia Cerro224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Keller
34W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
4.13
4.5
Deborah Kylander
61W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.09
Linda Armanetti
36W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Rebecca Hjort
61W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Jyl Collins
29W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Allison Farquharson
26W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Anne Marie Brayton
58W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Cheryl Olivadesa
82W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
Thea O Donnell
51W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Mary Nader
27W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Patricia Cerro
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Cheryl Mitteness
89W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.62
Pamela Feeney
112W–106L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Elizabeth MacFarlane
21W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Kathy Schelleng
19W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.33
Margaret Hart
93W–50L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.