Teams

V - Sherwood Starlets

2023 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - WE · Ventura - Women 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-03vs V - Las Posas HighballsWon 10
W#1 DoublesHollis Lanson / Eileen Kakoyiannis vs Catalina Wise / Becky Nelson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-12-02vs V - WACtown GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesGail Spayde / Eileen Kakoyiannis vs Michelle Bechard / Kimberly Bickmore-Hutt6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-11-11vs V - Pierpont RacquettesLost 01
L#1 DoublesEileen Kakoyiannis / Gail Spayde vs Michelle Duddy / Nicolette Villa6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-11-05vs V - Malibu Loosely StrungLost 01
L#1 DoublesGail Spayde / Eileen Kakoyiannis vs Holly Culhane / Sarah Wells1-6, 2-6
2023-10-28vs V - Royal GirlfriendsWon 10
W#1 DoublesEileen Kakoyiannis / Gail Spayde vs Kelley Bannon / Gizelda Parr6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesEileen Kakoyiannis / Gail Spayde vs Summer Williamson / Raymi Schwartz2-6, 2-6
2023-10-01vs V - Valle Lindo Volley GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Cavalier / Eileen Kakoyiannis vs Megan Vasquez / Anne Renard4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesEileen Kakoyiannis / Michelle Kramar vs Mary Ann Fermin / Maria Dickey7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Michelle Kramar
published
2.90
Eileen Kakoyiannis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Kimberly Lovi
published
2.79
Hollis Lanson
published 3
2.46
Lindsey Hansen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hollis Lanson + Kimberly Lovi404 matchesnot enough data
Eileen Kakoyiannis + Michelle Kramar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Kramar
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Eileen Kakoyiannis
116W–91L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
Kimberly Lovi
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Hollis Lanson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Catharine Chambers
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsey Hansen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.